healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] 3.5 Rearend (was Re: On the Road Home from Conclave

To: healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] 3.5 Rearend (was Re: On the Road Home from Conclave
From: bspidell@comcast.net (Bob Spidell)
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:17:22 +0000
Hi John,


re:
"  Lower RPMs means lower 
> fuel consumption.  At $4.39 per gallon these days, it should pay off rather 
> quickly."


Don't expect miracles; i.e. a linear reduction in fuel usage due to the taller 
gearing.  My MPG didn't increase much when I installed the 3.54 rearend (maybe 
1mpg highway at 65mph).  As it was explained to me--and this makes 
sense--you'll need the same amount of power to push a car at 60mph regardless 
of the gearing (you'll need more torque for the taller gears/lower RPM, hence 
horsepower required will be the same).  That is, you'll have the throttle open 
farther--and thus use more air and fuel--to do 60 with a 3.5 rearend and 28% 
O/D than with a 3.9 rearend and 22% O/D, but RPM will be reduced (the reduction 
in engine noise and vibration at highway speed is worth the price of admission, 
IMO).  Also, I think it's easier to hold a more constant speed with the taller 
gears, which might account for the small improvement I saw (sorta like a poor 
man's "cruise control").

This is consistent with aircraft engines with constant-speed 
propellers--there's literally an infinite combination of prop speeds and 
throttle settings (in manifold pressure expressed in inches of mercury) that 
can produce any particular power setting (e.g. 55, 65 or 75% power), although 
with turbosupercharged engines running "oversquare"--e.g. 50 inches of manifold 
pressure at 2,100RPM--can markedly increase range (as Charles Lindbergh proved 
to the AAF in the Pacific in WWII).  But, this is largely achieved with the 
volumetric efficiencies achieved with supercharging (effectively raising the 
compression ratio; which will increase "mileage").


bs

--
***************************************************************
Bob Spidell         San Jose, CA        bspidell@comcast.net
'67 Austin-Healey 3000             '56 Austin-Healey 100M
***************************************************************

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: John H <jhomonek@mindspring.com>
> Bob,
> 
> I just recently installed a newly rebuilt sideshift trans and 28% out of 
>extra 
> parts I had laying around.  I haven't been on a long trip yet to log mileage 
> benefits but it really lowers the RPMs when kicked in.  The real test will 
>come 
> at SE Classic in September....Atlanta to Lynchburg, TN.  Lower RPMs means 
>lower 
> fuel consumption.  At $4.39 per gallon these days, it should pay off rather 
> quickly.
> 
> By the way, it is matched with the 3.54 rearend too.  First gear starts on 
> inclines only and second gear on level or downhill starts.
> 
> John Homonek
> Atlanta AHCA
> 1959 BN7 - 1960 AN5 - 1974 Jensen-Healey
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>