healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] BN2 -100 lemans

To: Rich C <richchrysler@quickclic.net>, healeys@autox.team.net,
Subject: Re: [Healeys] BN2 -100 lemans
From: <tomfelts@windstream.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:52:36 -0500
Wonder how the seller would respond to this news?  Anyone want to share 
it--minus Rich's name, of course.


---- Rich C <richchrysler@quickclic.net> wrote: 
> There are so many detail hings wrong with this car, it's ridiculous. Whoever 
> built this car up doesn't know anything about Healeys, let alone the Lemans 
> bits. All I can see that could be remotely considered Lemans is the bonnet 
> strap and the wrong louver pattern on the bonnet, possibly a larger diameter 
> antisway bar. Much of it looks like they simply bought things from a 
> catologue and stuck them on the car.
> Most things can be changed and made right but the irreversible is that  the 
> louvers on the bonnet are totally wrong. The pictures showing the rear inner 
> dogleg area seem to have a riveted plate?? fitted in there.
> The interior is all wrong in that it should be blue, not black. There are 
> terrible full pleats in horribly over stuffed seats, there's no arm rest and 
> the doors sport set of Amco style door panels with elastic pockets right out 
> of the '60's. The Armacord is running the wrong way on the rear deck behind 
> the seats, and under the seats. Armacord should be on the propshaft tunnel 
> on a BN2, not carpet. All the Armacord is bound wrong.  It looks as though 
> the top doesn't fasten to the body behind the doors. And what's with the 
> blue vinyl covered dash? White painted wheels?
> The engine colours are wrong as are a lot of the engine bay pieces.
> 
> On the other hand this car appears to me to have been carefully done as far 
> as body panel fit and finish. It looks like somebody perhaps ran out of 
> funds or whatever, and handed it to somebody to slap together and sell 
> quickly. Divorce requiring quick settlement, death, who knows, but to me it 
> has all the signs.
> 
> I would love to have the opportunity to correct all the details on this car. 
> It has the potential of being an excellent BN2.
> 
> FWIW, the chassis number listed would have a built date of approx. late 
> Sept. '55, so it's a relatively early BN2.
> 
> If anybody knows the car I'd like to obtain (for the Registry) the rest of 
> the numbers and who the owner is (or will be).
> 
> Rich Chrysler
> Hundred Registrar
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
> 
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
> 
> You are subscribed as tomfelts@windstream.net
> 
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>