healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Emissions Compliance in New Jersey

To: healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Emissions Compliance in New Jersey
From: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:23:37 +0200
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: healeys@autox.team.net
References: <CE171FD8.54086%rca53@columbia.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
10% CO at idle seems extremely high to me. There must be something out 
of tune or worn here. Between 2-5% CO should be fairly easily attained 
using a Colortune with properly build and maintained SU's . In the 50's 
and 60's 5-10% CO was not regarded as excessive.
High CO values always coincide with high hydro-carbon emissions because 
of partially unburned fuel. Another source of hydro-carbons is excessive 
oil consumption because of worn piston(ring)s
Servicing the carbs and tuning them properly will result in meeting the 
standards.

Kees Oudesluijs
NL


Op 26-7-2013 0:32, Atkinson, Robert schreef:
> The State of New Jersey has changed it's regulations so that cars older than
> 25 years are no longer eligible for "Collector Vehicle" status, a status which
> requires no emissions compliance but limits usage to no more than 3,000 miles
> per year (which is not a problem for me).  As a result, the Motor Vehicle
> Commission has refused to renew my Collector inspection sticker for my 1966
> BJ8.  My status choice now is: 1) "Antique" status, which has no emissions
> inspection but requires the infamous "QQQ" plates and theoretically limits
> usage to parades and club events, or 2) regular license plates and satisfying
> emissions standards.
>
> So, as soon as the DVM refused the renewal, I decided to see if my 1966 BJ8
> (with electronic ignition) could pass the emissions inspection (theoretically
> against some 1966 standard), fully expecting it to fail, which it did.  My
> questions:
>
> 1.  Is it at all possible that an Austin Healey can pass an emissions test in
> New Jersey?
>
> 2.  The "failure" was in the "idle" test with the following results:
>
>   *   Hydrocarbons parts per million: tested 1476 versus standard of 1400
> (seems pretty close)
>   *   Carbon monoxide (CO) percent: tested at 10.15% versus standard of 8.5%
> (not sure if that is close)
>
> I'd appreciate some suggestions on how to reduce both "hydrocarbons" (which I
> presume is largely unburned fuel) and CO.
>
> My first (only) thoughts:
>
>   *   Increase idle speed
>   *   Adjust carbs to leanest possible mix
>
> Any other thoughts?
>
> It doesn't cost me anything to retake the emissions test (other than time), so
> I'd like to be able to go through inspection, make some screw driver
> adjustments in the inspection station parking lot and go through again and
> again until I "pass."
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob Atkinson
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation  $12.75
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/coudesluijs@chello.nl
>
>
>
> -----
> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
> Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
> Versie: 2013.0.3349 / Virusdatabase: 3209/6519 - datum van uitgifte: 07/25/13
>
>


-- 
Kees Oudesluijs
Dorpsstraat 183
2995XG Heerjansdam
T: 078-677 1233
E: coudesluijs@chello.nl

Technische commissie Jensen Healey en GT
Het Jensen Genootschap Holland
www.jensenholland.nl
_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>