mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

FW: Webers

To: <WSpohn4@aol.com>
Subject: FW: Webers
From: "Chris Delling" <saschris@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 14:20:01 -0700
Bill-

My 77B has a DGV fitted.  It was a replacement for a single Z-S, and most
definitely is a HUGE improvement over that P.O.S.

Had I knew then what I know now, I would have seriously considered a dual
S.U. setup.  The cost of the DGV conversion is less than a set of new SU's,
and it is a bit easier on the maintenence side of the ledger.

I feel that with my engine - 9:1 C.R., Piper Cam, European spec 45D dizzy,
that the difference between the Weber and the S.U.'s is probably
negligible - although that is not based on any real life experience.

Regards,

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mgs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-mgs@autox.team.net]On
> Behalf Of WSpohn4@aol.com
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 1998 12:45 PM
> To: mgs@autox.team.net
> Subject: Webers
>
>
> I guess I am a little out of touch, but until I saw the number of posts
> regarding use of the Weber DGV carbs, I hadn't realized that so
> many people
> were replacing their SUs.
>
> I have used the DGV in the past, and while it is definitely a
> good carb, it
> shows no performance increase over stock (likely quite the
> contrary) yet some
> people seem to have been drawn to them, perhaps because of the
> name, thinking
> that they would add some horsepower.
>
> What has happened to shift so many people from the simple
> rebuilding of their
> original carbs with readily available parts? Is it imagined power
> gains, or
> perceived shortage in bits for the SU, or what?
>
> Even the side draft Webers make little difference to a stock
> engine, and even
> on a tuned one, the difference felt is at the top end, and pretty
> much useless
> on the street. I speak from actual experience here as well. They
> do at least
> _look_ racy, which I think accounts for quite a few unnecessary carb
> replacements, but the same thing can't be said for the DGV.
>
> IMH (but experienced) O, if you must modify, the 1 3/4" SUs make
> an excellent
> mod, with more power available up top, assuming that you have
> done the head
> work, combined with good low speed flexibility and mileage.
>
> Having said that, of course, I currently run both my race cars on
> twin Webers,
> but that is for real rather than imaginary advantage, as both
> have 4 intake
> ports (HRG head on the TVR and then the Twinkie head on the A).
>
> I'd be interested in why people have fitted the DGVs. Thanks in
> advance for
> satisfying my curiosity.
>
> Bill S.
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>