mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cingular Wireless - OT

To: Ronald Olds <tr6@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: Cingular Wireless - OT
From: Bill McLeod <wbmcleod@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 07:39:55 -0700
I, too have ATT, but have switched to GSM, and have no regrets (except 
for signing a 2 year agreement with a company that is about to be sold).
The GSM coverage is, for now, useable only in the more metropolitan 
areas.  The normal digital coverage we all know and love will go the way 
of the analog coverage of a few years ago, when my bag phone with the 
roof antenna would reach out for many miles in some of the most remote 
country in the West (I ran kitchens on forest fires for many years in 
the  80's and 90's).  The replacement GSM coverage will expand, but for 
now we are all either using a dying system or a growing but incomplete 
system.  It's kind of like living with Microsoft.....
Bill

Ronald Olds wrote:

>The most important feature of a phone if you want to have full coverage
>is to be able to work on analog as well as digital. There are many areas
>of the country where there is no digital and even more with no GSM
>coverage.  I travel all over the country mostly away from the big cities
>and have AT&T.  There are few places I don't have coverage.  I work with
>people who have all the other systems out there and my AT&T is by far
>the best. I am able to se my phone where many can't.  I hope this is not
>lost when AT&T is sold.
>
>Ron Olds





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>