mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Mgs] MGC rear axle

To: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>, <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Mgs] MGC rear axle
From: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:55:43 -0000
MGC and MGB (4-cylinder and V8) used the same axle design, although it 
changed from the Banjo to the Salisbury/tube with the GT and on the 
roadsters by July 67.  Disc and wire axles are different lengths in both 
cases - both casing and half-shafts.  There are other major differences 
between the two on the Banjo.  The B diff was always 3.909:1 (11/43) 
although the auto used 3.7:1 (10/37).  For competition you could get 4.555:1 
(9/41), 4.3:1 (10.43), and 4.1:1 (10/41) on the banjo, only the first and 
4.22:1 (9/38) on the Salisbury.  There was also a ZS LSD for both.  MGC used 
3.07:1 (14/43), 3.307:1 (13/43) and 3.7:1 (10/37) depending on year and 
gearbox.  All these can be fitted to the MGB as well of course.  The V8 also 
had the 3.07:1 for all cars.

>From Clausager.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
To: <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 4:02 PM
Subject: [Mgs] MGC rear axle


> Hey'all,
>
>
>
> Is the rear axle on an MGC-GT common to other BMC cars? Big Healey? Is it
> the same as an MGB?
>
>
>
> What axle ratios were available?
>
>
>
>
>
> Wm. Severin Thompson
>
> ~iii<O
>
>
>
> <mailto:wsthompson@thicko.com> wsthompson@thicko.com
>
> <http://www.thicko.com/> www.thicko.com
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/png which had a name of 
> image001.png]
> _______________________________________________
> paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk
>
> Edit your replies
>
> Mgs@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs
_______________________________________________

Edit your replies

Mgs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>