oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oletrucks] Window statics and my brush with temptation

To: oletrucks@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] Window statics and my brush with temptation
From: New Mexico Jim <ADvent@thuntek.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 07:57:30 -0600
and with chevy's on the back and gmc's on the front?

john cook wrote:

> capital idea !
> john cook 46 3/4
> 50 1/2
> 50 3/4
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom3600@webtv.net <Tom3600@webtv.net>
> To: Billy Gibson <bgibson@internetwork.net>
> Cc: Bill Bailey <billb@gamewood.net>; oletrucks <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
> Date: Friday, July 14, 2000 5:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [oletrucks] Window statics and my brush with temptation
>
> >
> >--WebTV-Mail-17481-4506
> >
> >HooT -
> >
> >I agree,  lets go with one Art Deco, one Advance Design, and one Task
> >Force pickup unmodified stock photos/drawings together in one scene.  I
> >have a reproduction of an old "Chevrolet Super Service"  clock with all
> >three and it is kinda cool.
> >
> >
> >Tom Poterack
> >Moline, IL.
> >'49 Chevy 3600
> >http://www.chevytrucks.org/users/wayne/tom49.jpg
> >
> >
> >--WebTV-Mail-17481-4506
> >Content-Disposition: Inline
> >
> >Received: from mailsorter-101-11.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.45) by
> > storefull-241.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 14 Jul 2000
> > 14:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
> >Return-Path: <oletrucks-owner@autox.team.net>
> >Received: from teamfat2.dsl.aros.net (teamfat2.dsl.aros.net
> [207.173.21.42])
> > by mailsorter-101-11.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8-wtv-f/ms.dwm.v7+dul2)
> > with ESMTP id OAA11294; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: (from majordom@localhost) by teamfat2.dsl.aros.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)
> > id PAA24342 for oletrucks-actors; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:41:29 -0600 (MDT)
> >Message-ID: <003701bfeddc$898d7380$0101a8c0@internetwork.net>
> >From: "Billy Gibson" <bgibson@internetwork.net>
> >To: "Bill Bailey" <billb@gamewood.net>, "oletrucks"
> <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
> >References: <3.0.1.32.20000713143118.00705ae0@mail.inetnow.net>
> <002d01bfedeb$b097d060$8cde5e18@kscable.com>
> > <003801bfed8a$44ecc2a0$bd6096d0@tcape> <396F0676.7C258FF7@gamewood.net>
> >Subject: Re: [oletrucks] Window statics and my brush with temptation
> >Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:43:23 -0500
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
> >Sender: owner-oletrucks@autox.team.net
> >Precedence: bulk
> >Reply-To: "Billy Gibson" <bgibson@internetwork.net>
> >
> >I have a question
> >If the sticker say's 1941 to 1959
> >why don't have the pictures be
> >1941 and 1959??????
> >
> >Just a question please don't shoot me
> >H@@T 58
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Bill Bailey <billb@gamewood.net>
> >To: oletrucks <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
> >Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 7:24 AM
> >Subject: [oletrucks] Window statics and my brush with temptation
> >
> >
> >> Funny thing..I never noticed that the AD truck in the sticker has rally
> >> wheels and I look at that thing every day in the back window of my 57...
> >> The only thing I would like to see on a new ones is that they show up
> >> better because you can't see them at all on a tinted window like the one
> >> in the back of my 98 Silverado.
> >> Stock..rod...one of each please ;)
> >> I almost bought another toy last week. It was a 49 1/2 ton, that had
> >> been rebuilt several years ago. Good paint..ran good..and it was stock
> >> save for a early 60's 235 and a *very* oddball wiring system that
> >> incorporated the 6V system for all the truck functions and a 12V battery
> >> (under the DRIVERS side floorboard) that ran the stereo. I would have
> >> just taken that out and changed the whole mess over to a new harness and
> >> a 12 system. All of this for the asking price of 2900 dollars. I had a
> >> lot of soul searching to do ..I knew if I bought this truck then my 57
> >> project would die. I know myself that well. It didn't help any that my
> >> friend the F100 man was tempting me like the Devil himself. At any rate
> >> I made the decision to pass it up, a decision I am sure that I will
> >> question for a long time. But at any rate the 49 has been sold now an I
> >> will continue on with ol rusty, maybe someday I'll have something I can
> >> be proud of. Time will tell...
> >>
> >> tcape wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hey, we're starting to sound like Star Trek........"We're having
> trouble
> >> > with the Klingons!"  I remember when we were discussing the design on
> >the
> >> > old sticker a couple of years ago.  Same issue....rod vs. stock.  We
> >finally
> >> > settled on one of each.  Perhaps to resolve this issue, we do need a
> >"STOCK"
> >> > version and a "ROD" version.  However, will this increase the cost to
> >the
> >> > point that it's not feasible??  Guess we need to hear from the folks
> who
> >are
> >> > looking into getting the stickers made.  Thanks guys!
> >> > Tom Caperton
> >> > 47-2nd 3100....in Whiteville, NC
> >> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
> >
> >
> >oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
> >
> >--WebTV-Mail-17481-4506--
> >oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
> >
>
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>