| To: | "William M. Schickling" <bugeye@dreamscape.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 1098 Head |
| From: | "David Ramsey" <dwramsey@worldnet.att.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 98 21:13:05 PST |
| Cc: | spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
| In-reply-to: | <000301bd3c85$30b001c0$3d0e7fcf@europa.gaylord.com> |
| References: | Conversation <000301bd3c85$30b001c0$3d0e7fcf@europa.gaylord.com> with last message <000301bd3c85$30b001c0$3d0e7fcf@europa.gaylord.com> |
| Reply-to: | "David Ramsey" <dwramsey@worldnet.att.net> |
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
----------
Hi,
The1098 heads are better, not only bigger valves but also larger
ports,and open chambers(not shrouded like 948's. The best are the 206 head and
then the 295 head I don't know production years for these heads. Use a 1098
fel-pro head gasket. Obvious difference is that 1098 heads have a plug on the
right side near the front that could be used for temp sending unit 948's don't.
Crash
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Midget Conspiracy?, Trevor Boicey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Tyre Sizes, Matthew P Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | 1098 Head, William M. Schickling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 1098 Head, Brian Evans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |