spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency

To: <Lancer7676@aol.com>, <cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com>, <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency
From: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 09:16:32 +1100
References: <0.52968b6d.2554a920@aol.com>
Reply-to: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Too much advance will cause detonation (pining, pinging).

Overheating in traffic is more likely not enough advance (timing is
too far retarded)

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: <Lancer7676@aol.com>
To: <cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, 6 November 1999 8:41
Subject: Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency


> In a message dated 11/5/99 3:31:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
> << I was wondering if
>  perhaps poorly set timing could be responsible for interfereing with the
>  cooling efficiency. >>
>
> Absolutely, Charles. According to my main resource person, if you set the
> timng too far advanced your engine will overheat.
>
> --DAvid C.
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>