spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LBC/Y2K

To: Bkitterer@aol.com, spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: LBC/Y2K
From: Ajhsys@aol.com
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 09:53:42 EST
Reply-to: Ajhsys@aol.com
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
In a message dated 12/31/99 2:12:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
Bkitterer@aol.com writes:

<< Now, all our 2000 calendars have February 29 on them.  It seems that 
 somewhere back in school I learned that we didn't add the day in February 
for 
 dates ending in 00.  Is this a new way of figuring time, or is it a hype 
 thing like the 1999 millennium, or is it just that the people who should 
know 
 better don't? >>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Well, you are half right. You don't have a leap year in years ending in 00, 
unless the year is divisible by 4.  2000 is divisible by 4, so it is a leap 
year.  This is all so intuitive, I thought everybody knew it!  :-)

Happy new year!

Allen Hefner
SCCA Philly Region Rally Steward
'77 Midget
'92 Mitsubishi Expo LRV Sport

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>