| To: | Daniel1312@aol.com, "spridgets@autox.team.net" <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: Improving Safety and Reliability |
| Date: | Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:31:19 -0500 |
| Organization: | Very little |
| References: | <6a.e87bad.25f56a4a@aol.com> |
depends on the amperage rating of the nail.
(btw, never use 'slow blow' nails)
paul m
Daniel1312@aol.com wrote:
> Does this mean using a NAIL to replace a blown fuse is a bad idea?
>
> Daniel1312
--
"If the only part you have is a nail,
then every problem looks like a fuse!"
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: Improving Safety and Reliability, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: Improving Safety and Reliability, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: Improving Safety and Reliability, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: Improving Safety and Reliability, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |