spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: almost...

To: "'Daniel1312@aol.com'" <Daniel1312@aol.com>, spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: almost...
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:59:10 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"
The compression ratio with these pistons is supposed to be 9.00:1 and they
are flat topped (FWIW).  The starter turned the old engine over just fine
(before the engine blew).  The only difference is the starter is now
attached to a different engine with the higher compression pistons.  The
lowsy starter idea did cross my mind until hooking up jumper cables to a
running car allowed for quicker turning of the starter.  Minimal cranking
amps is hopefully the cause.  How different is the 1500 starter from the
earlier ones?

I may go home and try to jetison some more oil against the wall tonight.

adrian

-----Original Message-----
From Daniel1312 at aol.com [mailto:Daniel1312@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 2:51 PM
To: adrian@workgroup.net; spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: almost...


In a message dated 31/03/00 05:30:31 GMT Daylight Time, adrian@workgroup.net

writes:

<<  (he has a fiat).>>

I guess someone has to own them!

<< the poor battery can hardly turn the engine over, even with a full charge

(with plugs out it turns over as fast as my Honda).  >>

If the battery has a full charge it might the starter struggling or you have

a compression ratio of way over 12:1 (good for part throttle economy btw).


Daniel1312
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>