spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Front shocks.. Hmmm.. I wonder if..

To: "Peter C." <nosimport@mailbag.com>, <conan@ralvm8.vnet.ibm.com>, <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Front shocks.. Hmmm.. I wonder if..
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:13:07 -0700
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20020211131518.02663dd0@mailbag.com>
Well, there is now. Moss is selling MGB shock bodies with big Healey arms as
replacements.......gotta cut fender liner to make them fit....Geesh!

Dave@SWCP.com Taos Garage Annex in Albuquerque
'59 AH :{)  '54 100
http://www.britishcarforum.com/TaosAnnex.htm
----- Original Message -----
From "Peter C." <nosimport at mailbag.com>
To: <conan@ralvm8.vnet.ibm.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: Front shocks.. Hmmm.. I wonder if..


> Nope. Not even valving.
>          Peter C.
> --------
> At 11:57 AM 2/11/2002, conan@ralvm8.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> >   I was just kinda wondering how much tolerance there is in
> >shock body manufacturing.  Particularly the distance between
> >the centerline of the pivot on the front shock and the bottom
> >(mounting surface) of the shock body.
> >   Was there any difference in shock bodies over the years?
> >(-other- than valving)?  Upper control arm length?
> >   IF there's any significant difference it might be a legal
> >way to get a touch more negative camber for stock class
> >autocrossing. :-)
> >    Ed in NC

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>