| To: | RevdSpridget@aol.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: disc vs drum |
| Date: | Sat, 01 Mar 2003 18:12:45 -0600 |
| Cc: | talla@TELUSPLANET.NET, spridgets@autox.team.net |
| References: | <19d.119a5de9.2b929777@aol.com> FILETIME=[A0B335E0:01C2E050] |
Drive through a deep puddle of water with drums, and then disc. See which one stops sooner......... RevdSpridget@aol.com wrote: > He is right - the only advantage is that THE DISCS COOL FASTER. Of course > what he neglected to say that as a consequence discs are much less prone to > fade and that fade = no brakes at all. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [No LBC] New Truck, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [No LBC] New Truck, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: disc vs drum, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: disc vs drum, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |