spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: tach, vs. dwell tach, vs emperical testing.

To: Bill L <pythias@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: tach, vs. dwell tach, vs emperical testing.
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:36:32 -0400
Cc: spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Organization: New Jersey's Governer SUCKS
References: <1159173037.20030714192846@pacifier.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01
Bill L wrote:
> Hello spridgets,
> 
>       by now nearly everyone is familiar with my problems in
>       calibrating my tach, to a dwell tach to emperical testing
>       (measured mile/time)... well.. to add to the problem, which i
>       thought i had solved, it turns out the tach is temperature
>       sensitive.??????!!!!!!!


That means the "Whatchamacallit" is cracked. Seriously, there is a 
resistor like thing inside, it cracks with age, that is what needs to be 
replaced. I do not know what it's called, it's a stripped big resistor 
like electronic gizmo and they used to be available at radio shack in 
packs of 2, they are smaller these days. I bought them once.
Hey, I can't even work a cell phone and I can't use a hammer inside a 
tach, that's my best description. Sorry.


-- 
Frank Clarici
Toms River, NJ
5 British cars on the road
http://www.exit109.com/~spritenut

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>