I also have a DCOE 40, that will eventually end up on the 1275. I have heard
that even a 40 is even a bit more than a stock 1275 can handle. As you
experiment, I would like to know if you end up choking it down to a 38.
Thanks,
Brad
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Kirk Hargreaves <khargreaves2@gmail.com>wrote:
> David,
>
> I run a 45 on a stock compression 1275. I kind of wish I had gone with a
> 40
> as I hear that the 45 is more for a racing application and that it only has
> a benefit at higher RPM's? In other words for a stock engine like mine. .
> I would have been wiser to go with a 40 (better match for my 1275)?
>
>
> I actually am running an Japanese OER which is the equivalent of the DCOE
> 45. . takes the same jets and emulsion tubes as the Weber but has an accel
> adjustment and an adjustable float bowl height to remove any supposed flat
> spots that might be found in a Weber when hard cornering. Not sure if if
> is
> even necessary compared to the Weber. . but I mention it anyway.
>
> I will say that I love the performance I am getting from my carb. . but I
> wonder if the 40 would have been a better match?
>
> I may sell the carb on eBay and bump down to a 40. . not sure. .
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kirk
> 59 1275
> _______________________________________________
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation $12.75
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage <http://www.team.net/forums%0AUnsubscribe/Manage>:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/spridgets/tequila.brad@gmail.com
>
>
--
DON JULIO 1942
www.myspace.com/tequilabrad
_______________________________________________
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|