Severin,
Thanks for the article. It should serve as a great reminder to all to look
beyond the message to the motive and/or agenda of the author. Nader was trying
to make a name for himself and his deciphels. He did just that based on false
information. Fast-forward 40 years and we see the Michael Moores, Bill
Mahers (and, yes, Rush Limbaughs on the other side) with their thin,
condescending "facts" presented as the gospel. But that's how they make their
livings-and
good ones, I might add. They're free to say what they want as long as we
keep laughing, buying the books and paying to see the "documentaries."
Regrettably, too many people buy it as the truth.
In 1965 it was considered serious investigative journalism. Today we should
all know better.
Cheers!
Steve
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Team-thicko mailing list
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/team-thicko
http://www.team.net/archive
|