tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 351W heads

To: hjenssen@juno.com (Herb J. Jenssen)
Subject: Re: 351W heads
From: rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu (Bob Palmer)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 97 14:30:00 PDT
Herb,

The 351W heads are the same with respect to valve train geometry.  It's the 
valves that are different; longer valve stems.  If you just pretend it's a 
289 or 302 head and use valves for either of these heads, I think everything 
is fine.

Bob


>I ran 69 351W heads on a 302 for over 15 years. I had .040 over flat top
>forged pistons. With the heads shaved to be sure they were flat I had
>between 68 & 69 cc per cyl. 
>I figured about 9.0 to 1 comp.
>I Can't remember what bolts I used. It might have been stock with
>washers.
>I did buy special push rods from Mier racing because I was told the valve
>train geometry was different when you put 351W heads on a small block.
>I did not drill any holes in anything!
>I had many runs and street driving with that Tiger and never had any
>problems.
>P.S I had the block o-ringed so I wouldn't have anymore blown head
>gaskets. Thats what started the whole modification.
>                                                                         
>               Later
>                                                                         
>                   Herb
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>