This is a very good idea, but would require not only a "code system" in
appropriately titled messages, but would require folks to use the
codes...... how likely?
i, like you, only actually read a small portion of the total message
traffic.
Mark? how bout it?
aaron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rod Knox [SMTP:rknox@horizon.bc.ca]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 1998 2:17 PM
> To: triumphs@autox.team.net
> Subject: re: new list (alternatives?)
>
>
> This has been said before but ... If we put accurate descriptions in
> the
> subject line, eg. "model" or "type of info" or "conversational
> ramblings" I
> would be all for keeping us under 1 list. Everyone, according to their
> personality and/or needs, uses the list for different things. If we
> can
> each weed out what we don't want to look at, then less time is wasted.
> I
> read between 1% and 5% of the messages and over the years have found
> very
> valuable advice.
> =============================================================
> Rod Knox
> Accumap Services Ltd.
> 1234 Union Road
> Victoria, B.C., Canada
> V8P 2J6
> Tel: (250) 380-9600
> Fax: (250) 380-9577
> Internet rknox@horizon.bc.ca
> ==============================================================
|