triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: burnt valve

To: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>
Subject: Re: burnt valve
From: "Graham Stretch" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 23:01:58 +0100charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: "Triumph List" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <011001c0016d$b244f2e0$76eaa4d8@vafred>
Hi Fred
This is a brilliant test, though I believe it has a draw back, won't the
same thing happen with a long duration camshaft, as they tend to have longer
valve overlap?
I ask this as you started me thinking, I have a 150 bhp TR5 cam in my PI
saloon and I get the suck back effect, but I also have a cylinder that only
reads 160 psi on the compression test, and although this doesn't seem too
low the rest read 200 psi, I never connected the two things before though I
was concerned about a burnt valve. Can you or any one else shed any light on
the cam duration aspect?

Graham.
2.5 PI MKII
Sprinted Dolomite
2000 MKI
Toledo
1300 Front Wheel Drive

http://www.triumph-iw.co.uk

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>
To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 8:20 PM
Subject: burnt valve


>
> quickest way to check for burnt valves, start the car, and hold a dollar
> bill over the tail pipe, a burnt valve will suck the bill up against the
> tail pipe, takes 2 seconds to do this.  "FT"
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>