triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PDWA...one more time... and other Triumph stuff

To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: PDWA...one more time... and other Triumph stuff
From: "Tom O'Malley" <tom.omalley@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:42:58 -0400
References: <d6.187fa9c7.2a4d079a@aol.com> <NOEDJDCNFBCNELMBFNFEIEILDEAA.ryoung@navcomtech.com>
I'm lost... <as always> :-)

What's the potential advantage in blocking the flow of fluif with a
dual chambered MC?  Can someone theorize the advantage of sealing the
faulty circuit at the PDWA instead of just letting the MC pump the bad
chamber dry?  

Cheers!
Tom O'Malley


On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:48:55 -0700, you wrote:

>> Any questions? :-)
>
>Well, yeah, now that you mention it.  Who has actually taken one of these
>things apart, and seen exactly how it is that the piston does not block the
>flow of fluif through the low pressure side ?
>
>There are different part numbers for different cars, and different designs
>fitted to the same car, can anyone state categorically that they have
>examined all of them in this respect ?
>
>I thought not <g>
>
>Randall

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>