triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Non TR, but a newer LBC question

To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Non TR, but a newer LBC question
From: Hoyt <hoyt@cavtel.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 00:06:41 -0500
Organization: MaximumHoyt.com
References: <000901c63fd2$0e6ec3e0$6501a8c0@mikeslaptop> k2557lhN010014
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
On Saturday 04 March 2006 16:24, Michael Marr wrote:
>  However, the satellite radio antenna coax is different from standard
> coax (it has a much smaller diameter) and it has a different connector.
>  Does anybody know if there is any reason which the existing coax could not
> be used, and is anybody aware of an adapter that would connect my satellite
> radio antenna coax to standard coax?

Satellite frequencies are much higher than cellular phones. Coaxial cable 
losses are greater at higher frequencies and the impedencies  of the coax may 
be different. I woudl stick with the satellite radio antenna coax for the 
satellite radio antenna.

-- 
Hoyt
KB4OQ


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org


===  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>