triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] classic vs vintage

To: dorpaul@negia.net, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [TR] classic vs vintage
From: zoboherald@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:01:54 -0400
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Dorsey <dorpaul@negia.net>

  Is there a difference btw classic and vintage cars?

==AM==
Short answer: no, not like there used to be.

However, many would (accurately) argue that there is or should be a 
difference. For example, the Classic Car Club of America is quite 
specific, with a list of cars between 1925-48 that fit their definition 
of classic. See <http://www.classiccarclub.org/CarList.htm>. Note that 
there are two Triumphs on that list -- Dolomite 8 and Gloria 6 -- but 
no Fords. ;-)

Vintage seems to have become a much more vague descriptor, although 
several have defined it for their own purposes. For example, The 
Vintage Triumph Register was formed in 1974 and, at the time of its 
founding until the end of Triumph production in 1981 (not counting the 
Acclaim), defined eligible Triumphs as those 10 years old or older. 
(All three Heralds in my family at that point qualified, as did my 
TR3A, but my Mk3 Spitfire did not.)

Meanwhile, one example of an attempt to define "vintage" may be found 
here: 
<http://vintagecars.about.com/od/historygreatmoments/a/vintagedefined.htm
>

Clear as mud now, right? :-)

--Andy  Mace

*Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is it a jet?
*Man: Well, no ... It's not so  much of a jet, it's more your, er, 
Triumph Herald engine with  wings.
 -- Cut-price Airlines Sketch, Monty Python's Flying Circus  (22)

Check out the North American Triumph Sports 6 (Vitesse 6) and Triumph 
Herald Database at its new URL: <http://triumph-herald.us>


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>