triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] MG vs. Triumph

To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] MG vs. Triumph
From: Jeremy Kinney <kinneyjr@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:15:00 -0500
Jonmac,



Could you tell us more about the "unfamiliar" pattern that the
auto-journalists don't follow?  Good stuff.



Thanks,

Jeremy

'66 TR4A





--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:12:18 +0000 (GMT)
From: John Macartney <macartney.john@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [TR] MG vs. Triumph
To: triumphs@autox.team.net, fot@autox.team.net
Message-ID: <473612.37514.qm@web28309.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I love both makes, always have and have owned several different examples of
most models on either side of the make fence. Wouldn't necessarily agree with
the Sam Smith's overall article content or fact - but then most
auto-journalists of today (IMHO) weren't born when the cars of which they
write were being made, and their knowledge of the industry is virtually
non-existent. Mr. Smith follows a familiar pattern.

Jonmac


_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/

_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

Suggested annual donation  $11.47



Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>