Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Moss\s+supercharging\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Moss\s+supercharging\s+question\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Foster, Stan" <stan.foster@hp.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:10:34 +0000; [ I sent this early today but didn't see it appear on the list, perhaps it fell foul of the size limit. I'll remove the content so I can least get my question in..] I hope everyone is enjoying the su; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00145.html (7,404 bytes)
2. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:42:17 -0700; Moss has the instructions posted on line, and yes, you are correct. They do indeed replace the damper with a simple pulley. The damping function is deleted with the Moss kit. The crank damper is ess; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00147.html (9,089 bytes)
3. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:50:36 -0400 (EDT); I replied to Stan off-list with a shorter message indicating exactly what Vance says. The key here - TR6 cranks are def. a weak spot as they are highly stressed owing to the over-square design and t; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00150.html (8,857 bytes)
4. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Joseph Grant" <grant@bowtie6.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:10:19 -0400; OK, question about the SC kit: So suppose you spend the $3500 for the SC kit, plus the $750 for the damper, how much would be a good ballpark figure to estimate for 'optimizing' the rest of the engin; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00151.html (9,572 bytes)
5. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Foster, Stan" <stan.foster@hp.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:19:23 +0000; I'm budgeting 6K to have a running but worn engine optimized for a SC and another $4k for the SC itself. No wonder some people opt to drop in a crate small block V8 !. A refurbed but non optimized en; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00153.html (8,257 bytes)
6. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:49:55 -0400 (EDT); Balance - $400 crank prep - $300 - $1000 ($1k would include nitriding, which is a good idea) Bearings - $100, plus or minus Rods - $300 to prep stock rods up to $2500 for Carillo (Carillos were $360; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00155.html (9,297 bytes)
7. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:15:15 -0700; While I can't deny the "Gee whiz" factor of having a supercharger, you can easily get your TR6 to 150 fully streetable, "daily driver" horsepower for less than half of what you are talking about her; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00156.html (8,899 bytes)
8. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "steve bridge" <slbridge@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:48:18 +0000; It's pretty and all, but for the half the price of a SC kit, I could build my 2.5 strong at OEM specs, put GM throttle bodies on a DGV intake, and plumb in a 2.2 Mopar Tubo blowing through the TB's.; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00157.html (8,144 bytes)
9. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:49:52 -0700; Joe--You could do all of the things that are required for a high rpm race engine, but I don't think it's necessary. An engine in decent condition will take a modest "boost", such as the one offered b; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00163.html (10,757 bytes)
10. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Shaw" <slowtoaccept@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:11:55 -0400; If you have a healthy stock engine with modest mileage, strapping on a SC may be a good option. When I looked into it, I decided (after reading about your car in Kastner) that the added complexity w; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00176.html (9,511 bytes)
11. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Rick" <patton@suscom-maine.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 00:49:51 -0400; Hi All, Just couldn't help weighing in on this subject. My 75 TR6 is supercharged and I absolutely love it. It's not a kit from Moss or any other kit, it's my own unique design. The car is very stree; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00178.html (10,223 bytes)
12. Re: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: Mitch <ms6453@optonline.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:22:02 -0400; Hi Jerry, The need for an MSD, 02 sensor or vacuum gauge is not required for a SC/Turbo'd engine either. All of these are tuning tools that apply to stock motors or slightly warmed engines such as yo; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00179.html (8,625 bytes)
13. Re: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Shaw" <slowtoaccept@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:32:45 -0400; Hi Mitch Here're passages from Kastner's description (pp. 239-240) of Dick's turbocharged car (which is a very impressive - as you can imagine): "The added MSD ingnition system makes revving out to t; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00181.html (10,236 bytes)
14. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Foster, Stan" <stan.foster@hp.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:09:44 +0000; Rick, that is quite impressive. I almost don't recognize it as a TR6 engine from the front.. On the cost question.. Assuming we are starting with a well used standard engine and the work is farmed ou; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00182.html (9,372 bytes)
15. Re: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:46:35 -0700; Jerry--I was surprised to read that your understanding was that Moss used a non-stock compression (9.5:1) ratio on their SC'd engine. I had not seen anything advertised to suggest that they used anyt; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00188.html (9,363 bytes)
16. Re: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Shaw" <slowtoaccept@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:47:05 -0400; Hi Dick I'm really confused. Here's the direct quote from the Moss webpage on their kit. http://www.mossmotors.com/Shop/ViewProducts.aspx?PlateIndexID=47648&SortOrder =4 "We installed a kit on a modi; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00189.html (10,072 bytes)
17. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: "John Korsak" <jkorsak@cableone.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:11:02 -0500; I believe there are two different charts involved here. The first is the chart for standard Moss kit added to a stock TR6 engine that shows the torque increased from a maximum of about 105 ft-lbs on; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00190.html (9,175 bytes)
18. RE: [6pack] Moss supercharging question (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:31:43 -0700; John (and Jerry) I called Moss Motors again yesterday to see if there were two versions of their SC reportings. Recall that the first fellow I talked to on 8/21 said " Moss used only the stock engine; /html/6pack/2007-08/msg00191.html (10,282 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]