Mail Archive Search: <+from:pfoster@gdi.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:pfoster@gdi.net: 492 ]

Total 492 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Shopping for a new home region (was Re: Solo2 Subsidizes (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:41:37 -0500; <<<If you "shop" wisely, you can save your regional dues money completely. I know of at least one region that gives away free regional memberships to anyone holding a specialty license and who declar; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00506.html (7,846 bytes)
62. What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:21:07 -0500; A friend of mine is campaigning on a Porsche mailing list to get people to write letters to the SEB to allow Porsche 944/824/968 cars in SM, something I have been arguing ever since Dennis Grant deci; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00528.html (9,976 bytes)
63. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:49:11 -0500; Mark Sipe responds: <<<The only thing wrong with this picture is that the artist is color-blind. >>> Color-blind?!? Here a National Champion sends a letter to the SEB stating that he believes the 4 s; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00532.html (8,235 bytes)
64. Re: Some thoughts on Ladies Classes (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:30:44 -0400; <<<Hell, we don't have to worry about losing female participation if the ladies classes are abolished. We have to worry about the men! I bet 50% of the men would quit if they thought they were going; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00030.html (7,243 bytes)
65. Re: Banquet Longevity (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:43:37 -0400; <<<Why would anyone be offended at the offering of a prayer? I must confess that I happen to be of the christian belief; however, I would not be offended if a member of another religeon wished to say; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00034.html (8,127 bytes)
66. Re: Banquet Longevity (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 22:22:22 -0400; Have you spent much time in other countries? I have and the typical rule of hand is to follow the local customs within reason. I'm not going to eat monkey brain under any circumstances but I fail to; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00095.html (7,960 bytes)
67. Re: Autocross Community (was Re: Any Civil Engineers in the House ?) (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:52:18 -0400; <<<Hm. What class does a Cessna fall into, anyway?>>> Whatever class happens to be running at the time?!? Paul Foster; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00273.html (7,321 bytes)
68. Re: Coil Over Spring Rates (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:44:43 -0400; Scott Meyers wrote (in part): <<<How would the 166# current rate translate into coil-over terms? Since it appears that the spring is around the shock and strut that it is a one-to-one ratio, and a tr; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00417.html (8,047 bytes)
69. Re: Coil Over Spring Rates (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:10:31 -0400; You might change the range of travel by using a larger or smaller spring, but I don't see how you are changing the lever arm unless you move the mounting points. Paul Foster; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00440.html (7,709 bytes)
70. Re: Coil Over Spring Rates (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:48:18 -0400; It certainly didn't on mine and I believe it is illegal to do so in SP. Paul Foster; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00463.html (7,643 bytes)
71. Re: Coil Over Spring Rates (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:57:38 -0400; Ah! Now I understand the confusion! I was referring to suspension mounting points, not spring mounting points... Paul Foster; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00464.html (7,959 bytes)
72. Re: Runoffs 1.1 (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:17:56 -0400; <<<Sorry - I meant T2. . . . . .>>> great SS cheating scandal of the 80s they have really been clamping down at the Runoffs by tearing down the 1st 3 finishers in SS and T. I am really surprised that; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00473.html (6,696 bytes)
73. Re: Why? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:47:28 -0400; Lessee, for me it is 480 miles to Atlanta and 260 to Miami. Despite always wanting to meet Mr. Thatcher I think I'll pass on both. A couple of hours drive is about my limit for an autocross. Paul "st; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00485.html (6,906 bytes)
74. Re: Roll Bar Rules Changes - Serious Stuff Here! (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:58:24 -0400; <<<2) For Street Prepared and Street Modified, as per Stock Class but welding of the attachment points permitted>>> IT cars are already allowed welded roll cages because they are much safer. They sho; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00487.html (8,182 bytes)
75. The Cage Issue, or How Many Cars Do I Need to Have?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:46:38 -0400; The point a lot of people seem to be missing is that autocrossing is supposed to be grassroots oriented. That means that if I have a track car I should be able to run it in Solo II without being cast; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00525.html (8,536 bytes)
76. Re: The Cage Issue, or How Many Cars Do I Need to Have?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:03:41 -0400; Dave Wihitworth responds: <<<If you want to run in all these series, and feel the need to have the most competitive equipment available, then you better start building cars.>>> Where the heck did you; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00564.html (7,832 bytes)
77. Re: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 09:56:10 -0400; <<<This would mean that any car with a GCR IT-SS cage, or an NHRA cage, be SoloII legal. And that's a huge win, IMHO.>>> Yes it would. Dennis is right for a change. ;-) Sorry to confuse some people w; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00580.html (7,396 bytes)
78. SCCA Welded Cages (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 11:46:47 -0400; Someone asked if anybody knew the history of this. I know a bit of it. Please excuse me if this is not 100% accurate. Until 4-5 years ago the SCCA did not allow welded cages in SS or IT because they; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00582.html (7,526 bytes)
79. Re: SCCA Welded Cages (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:19:12 -0400; Mike, Good points. Thanks for filling in some of the details. Paul Foster; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00602.html (7,035 bytes)
80. Re: leather fire suits (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:55:36 -0400; Check out what the firemen wear - no leather there. It may be due to leather shrinking substantially when it is exposed to heat. Paul Foster; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00661.html (6,326 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]