- 1. More Fiero (score: 1)
- Author: "James Rogerson" <jwalter@ptra.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:56:45 -0500
- It seems interesting that everyone that has discounted the original post, move the pre 1988 Fiero to another class, has used the content of the argument in that post to contradict the reasons. For th
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00883.html (7,704 bytes)
- 2. Re: More Fiero (score: 1)
- Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:48:25 -0700
- And as AB so aptly put it, there wasn't, nor is, a ground swell from Fiero owners. They all moved to Fiero club events or just off to other things or cars. The same thing has happened in other classe
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00885.html (7,978 bytes)
- 3. Re: More Fiero (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:48:49 -0700
- The committees NEVER heed a request just because someone writes in. If the request is founded and has a corresponding benefit to the club, it doesn't matter how many people write in, 1 or 1000. I wou
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00887.html (9,363 bytes)
- 4. Re: More Fiero (score: 1)
- Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:17:45 -0700
- I certainly meant a well-founded request. It sort of sounded like you meant "if enough folks asked for it, it would happen." The benefit to the club aspect can be a stretch for a definition. The club
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00891.html (10,345 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu