Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*stock\,\s+shocks\,\s+sways\,\s+ad\s+nauseum\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*stock\,\s+shocks\,\s+sways\,\s+ad\s+nauseum\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: stock, shocks, sways, ad nauseum? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:49:36 EDT; As with any class changes, eliminating any of the long standing Stock allowances potentially creates a lot of classing issues. I think everyone agrees the SEB has their hands full as it is with curre; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01319.html (7,901 bytes)
2. Re: stock, shocks, sways, ad nauseum? (score: 1): Author: jon e prevo <tcbracer@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:24:09 -0500; I happen to be one who believes that stock should mean stock. I believe that the stock rules are extremely too liberal, especially if it is actually to the point where classing is decided based on h; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01371.html (8,773 bytes)
3. Re: stock, shocks, sways, ad nauseum? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:51:14 -0500; concept on In answer to that, here are some other questions I have: 1. What happpens when a poor kid who's got lots of talent but had to learn to play his sport on the street plays tennis or soccer o; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01379.html (10,430 bytes)
4. Re: stock, shocks, sways, ad nauseum? (score: 1): Author: jon e prevo <tcbracer@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:11:11 -0500; Okay, you are straying from the issue. Your analogy fits in the scenario of one driver starting in a kart from age 6, taking driving schools repeatedly while growing up, obtaining an SCCA licence at; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01395.html (10,424 bytes)
5. Re: stock, shocks, sways, ad nauseum? (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 12:56:31 -0400 (EDT); They don't deserve to be sneered at, but what exactly do you propose to do to help the problem? The current stock class rules (with the exception in my mind for the front swaybar allowance) do a pre; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01401.html (9,957 bytes)
6. Re: stock, shocks, sways, ad nauseum? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 12:07:39 -0500; I disagree. schools and then because of his not raised And what does it cost to get all that practice? You got it, money. Is it _fair_ that one kid is born into the opportunity and another one deson'; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01402.html (12,746 bytes)
7. Re: stock, shocks, sways, ad nauseum? (score: 1): Author: jon e prevo <tcbracer@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 12:46:22 -0500; First, Jay, go back and reread my original post. You will find me sitting squarely on the fence on this issue, something that hasn't changed. I agree and completely see your point. I know where Gerry; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01405.html (9,695 bytes)
8. Re: stock, shocks, sways, ad nauseum? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:24:04 -0500; make it I just don't see how anybody can claim that one of the two remaining forms of motorsports (drag racing being the other) in which it is still possible to compete in your street ride has someho; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01409.html (9,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]