Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SFR\s+Divisional\s+Top\s+Rookie\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SFR\s+Divisional\s+Top\s+Rookie\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: CHDRX7@aol.com; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:29:36 EST; I'm trying to figure out who is eligible for the top rookie award from our SFR Divisional. The names I have are: Susan Trainor Justin McAfee Allison McAfee Jeff Gore Steve Bowlus Carlos Gomez Russ Bo; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00029.html (7,313 bytes)
2. RE: SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@Roche.COM>; Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 14:15:06 -0800; I thought the only requirement was that you had never done divisionals before, even if you autoxed prior to 2000. If so, doesn't Kevin Lahey belong on that list too? Peter (just lookin' out for my fe; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00030.html (7,976 bytes)
3. Re: SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: ejbaylis@pacbell.net; Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 20:16:07 -0700; Jeff Gore has been autocrossing for at least 2 years, maybe even 3 now. Not sure about anyone else. EJ; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00033.html (7,619 bytes)
4. RE: SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: craig boyle <craig_autox@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 22:02:23 -0800 (PST); As I remember it from the divisional, a rookie was fuzzily defined as someone with 1-2 years experience and not having done a divisonal/tour etc. IIRC Kevin L. was on the rookie list at that event, h; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00036.html (8,653 bytes)
5. Re: SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: CHDRX7@aol.com; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:49:00 EST; I was going to keep the criteria the same as we do for other Regional Rookie Awards and make it be someone in their first year of autocrossing... Sherry? Advice from the Rookie Maven? Charlie; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00037.html (7,517 bytes)
6. Re: SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: CHDRX7@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 01:40:40 EST; I've spoken with SFR's Rookie Maven, who reminded me that the "Top Divisional Rookie" award was started to honor someone who was participating in SFR's Rookie Program, and who went to our Divisional; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00038.html (7,784 bytes)
7. RE: SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 01:08:36 -0800; Kevin ran open class all this year, and he'd be in the trophies right behind Rick Gould if he hadn't missed 6 events. I know he was my student in LAST year's school, but sheesh, it shouldn't take a w; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00040.html (8,483 bytes)
8. Re: SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Lahey" <kml@patheticgeek.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:59:32 -0800; I'm with Kevin Stevens on this one -- after all, Kevin Lahey is supposed to be to be helping *run* the rookie program, not participating in it. And, IIRC, he managed to come in DFL in his class by ov; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00043.html (7,854 bytes)
9. RE: SFR Divisional Top Rookie (score: 1): Author: Ralph Elder <ralph@nars.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 09:20:05 -0800; As far as the award from the Division itself was concerned, you also had to get yourself onto the rookie list compiled by Ralphie ... the T&S software then computed the award winner using class indic; /html/ba-autox/2000-12/msg00110.html (8,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]