Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*OT\s+\-\s+68\s+Triumph\s+GT6\s+4\s+sale\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*OT\s+\-\s+68\s+Triumph\s+GT6\s+4\s+sale\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. OT - 68 Triumph GT6 4 sale (score: 1): Author: Andy Klink <colonel_klink510@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:33:49 -0700 (PDT); An acquaitance asked me if I was interested in buying a 68 GT6 that he purchased and isn't spending any time with. He is currently enjoying his E-Type Jag. Anyone interested? I think he wants $2000-$; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-10/msg00139.html (7,971 bytes)
2. Re: OT - 68 Triumph GT6 4 sale (score: 1): Author: CalSpeed@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:33:34 EDT; Hello, Nice and informative site. Just reading up alittle on this car amazed me on the amount of performance that our Roadsters had during the period that these cars were produced. Based on the infor; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-10/msg00140.html (7,815 bytes)
3. RE: OT - 68 Triumph GT6 4 sale (score: 1): Author: "Laury, Victor" <LauryV@MTA.NET>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:56:59 -0700; the other marques. How embarrasing it must have been for a 4 cylinder production car to put out 96hp in a 1600 and 150hp in a 2000. Embarassing was just the start of it. Triumph wanted the SCCA D pr; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-10/msg00141.html (7,881 bytes)
4. RE: OT - 68 Triumph GT6 4 sale (score: 1): Author: snyler <marc@animalfirm.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:34:46 -0500; Then the Z cane and killed it dead! Along with the MGBGT. -Marc t. == Marc Tyler Sisterdale TX 1970 1600 #SPL311-31016 "The Jaundiced Kid II" 1965 L-320 #L320 013642 "Domino" 1965 L-320 Parts car Don; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-10/msg00142.html (8,097 bytes)
5. Re: OT - 68 Triumph GT6 4 sale (score: 1): Author: Gary McCormick <svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 14:36:09 -0700; A Spitfire with a roof is all it is... the 2 add'l cylinders don't help much. Once in my mis-guided youth I wanted to buy a Spitfire of similar vintage (maybe a year or two newer). In a moment of goo; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-10/msg00143.html (9,757 bytes)
6. Re: OT - 68 Triumph GT6 4 sale (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:16:38 -0400; I highly doubt that our cars had 96HP or 125HP in reality. Like many cars of that era HP figures were highly exagerated. They may be faster than a GT6 but that's nothing to brag about. Mike on these; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-10/msg00149.html (8,989 bytes)
7. Re: OT - 68 Triumph GT6 4 sale (score: 1): Author: Adam Bradley <ambradley@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:19:14 -0700 (PDT); I read that Datsun HP ratings up through the 280z were SAE not net, so a 240z at 150hp is really more like 130hp net. Figuring at that rate my 96hp SAE 1600 was really 83hp. == Adam '70 1600 SPL311-2; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-10/msg00153.html (10,251 bytes)
8. Re: OT - 68 Triumph GT6 4 sale (score: 1): Author: CalSpeed@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 00:33:30 EDT; Oh.... I beg to differ. It is alot to brag about. No one is making comparisons to modern day cars. Calspeed /// /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-10/msg00166.html (7,403 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]