Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*differences\s+b\/w\s+\'68\s+2000\s+and\s+1600\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*differences\s+b\/w\s+\'68\s+2000\s+and\s+1600\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. differences b/w '68 2000 and 1600 (score: 1): Author: Will Slater <will45817@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:28:23 -0700 (PDT); What are the main differneces between the 1600 and the 2000. It appears that the grille was different and of course the badging. Were there other differneces? I appreciate your help. Will ___________; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-06/msg00423.html (7,225 bytes)
2. Re: differences b/w '68 2000 and 1600 (score: 1): Author: "John F Sandhoff" <sandhoff@csus.edu>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:02:18 -0700; It was asked: Yeah, the engine is different :-) Sorry, sorry.... The engine, tranny, driveshaft is different. I think the tranny mount, too. The rear end is different. Higher ratio (3.9 vs 3.7), to g; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-06/msg00431.html (7,774 bytes)
3. Re: differences b/w '68 2000 and 1600 (score: 1): Author: Chris Coker <chriscoker@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:33:35 -0400; Rear wheel brake cylinders are a different diameter, and it's possible that the rear leaf springs have a different spring rate, but I'm not sure about that. -- Chris Coker 69 1600 SPL311 <http://mywe; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-06/msg00435.html (8,776 bytes)
4. Re: differences b/w '68 2000 and 1600 (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:37:52 -0400; No, the brakes are all the same size for 'that' model year. The low windshields had a different size than the later cars. Spring rates are identical also. Mike /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mai; /html/datsun-roadsters/2003-06/msg00437.html (7,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]