- 1. Re: front end geometry (score: 1)
- Author: "Calvin Grandy" <cmgfam@sover.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 12:25:50 -0500
- Perhaps this topic has been up before, but as a "re-newed" roadster guy I could like to know better the design intentions of the roadster front suspension. Maybe there are a few Hi-Pro experts out th
- /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-11/msg00086.html (7,978 bytes)
- 2. Re: front end geometry (score: 1)
- Author: Toby B <toby@wolfenet.com>
- Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 01:30:33 -0800
- If you re-eyeball it, you'll find that the trailing a-arm pivot lines up with the ball joints. As to method, ? It does make the front suspension into a slight trailing arm, doesn't it? It's a brillia
- /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-11/msg00101.html (8,419 bytes)
- 3. Re: front end geometry (score: 1)
- Author: "Calvin Grandy" <cmgfam@sover.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 10:44:36 -0500
- Thanks for your comments. I didn't realize that the A-arm bushes were copies if a Brit design, but should have figured. Well there certainly will be no rational reason for the use of this system. On
- /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-11/msg00122.html (9,180 bytes)
- 4. RE: front end geometry (score: 1)
- Author: Howard Fletcher <hgf@netro.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 20:13:51 +1100
- Thanks Guys , what a good read. I think I have followed the argument but feel free to correct me. On a race set up we use a fairy high number for -ve camber and stiffer springs. This gives us a much
- /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-11/msg00134.html (9,687 bytes)
- 5. Re: front end geometry (score: 1)
- Author: "Calvin Grandy" <cmgfam@sover.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:38:53 -0500
- I was giving nothing to the aspect of camber. As this is separate from the steerable geometry. If the inner wheel does not point in the direction demanded by the turning radius and tire slip angle ge
- /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-11/msg00188.html (10,413 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu