Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Fuel\s+Tank\s+Sender\s+Unit\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Fuel\s+Tank\s+Sender\s+Unit\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Fuel Tank Sender Unit (score: 1): Author: Alan Bromfield <bluehealey@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:19:40 +0100; The tank sender unit in my BN4 is one of those Taiwanese pattern jobs. It came with a rubber gasket that isn't fuel proof, so guess what happened when I brimmed the tank for the first time? Doh! The; /html/healeys/2011-08/msg00101.html (8,186 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] Fuel Tank Sender Unit (score: 1): Author: "BJ8 Healeys" <sbyers@ec.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 10:34:30 -0400; Allen, the 0 to 70 ohms range given at the mgaguru site is for an MG Jaeger gauge. The Smiths gauge for BJ8s, and I assume also for BN4s, ranges from 0 to 90 ohms plus or minus. You should recalibrat; /html/healeys/2011-08/msg00103.html (8,802 bytes)
3. [Healeys] Fuel Tank Sender Unit (score: 1): Author: Alan Bromfield <bluehealey@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:04:01 +0100; Dammit! You're right Steve. It's there in the pics before my very eyes. Is 0 to 90 confirmed somewhere in Smiths literature from the time, or is that observed/measured on an original sender unit? Tha; /html/healeys/2011-08/msg00105.html (7,352 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] Fuel Tank Sender Unit (score: 1): Author: "BJ8 Healeys" <sbyers@ec.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:29:16 -0400; It is what I have measured with the original sending unit from my car, an original sending unit from another BJ8, and a Moss replacement. I assume it would be the same for all 3000 sending units. For; /html/healeys/2011-08/msg00106.html (8,219 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]