Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1928\-29\s+vs\.\s+1930\-31\s+Ford\s+Roadster\s+bodies\s+in\s+LSR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1928\-29\s+vs\.\s+1930\-31\s+Ford\s+Roadster\s+bodies\s+in\s+LSR\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 1928-29 vs. 1930-31 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Want1937hd@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:29:44 EST; This question came up on another board I read, why do more 28-29 bodied cars run at LSR events? A current book on Vintage Dry Lakes races has many photos of 28-29's but not one 30-31. I do know that; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00419.html (7,183 bytes)
2. Re: 1928-29 vs. 1930-31 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:57:21 -0800; My first roadster was a 1930. I ran it from 1959 until 1964 when I switched to a '29. The conventional wisdom was that the '29 was more aerodynamic(???). Really there is not much you can do to a roa; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00420.html (7,801 bytes)
3. RE: 1928-29 vs. 1930-31 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "James Tone" <James.Tone@AES.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 11:51:10 -0800; For a "Ford" it has the smallest cross sectional area for the years available by the rule book. Other manufacturers are smaller but not a popular as the Ford. If you can unbolt it, it's not part of t; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00422.html (8,567 bytes)
4. RE: 1928-29 vs. 1930-31 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:33:16 -0500; If you can unbolt it ,then it is not part of the body? That would make hoods ,doors and trunks open to whatever interpretation anyone might come up with?? Does this thought extend to other classes if; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00423.html (8,623 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]