Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Modulation\s+Gone\!\s+Now\s+what\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Modulation\s+Gone\!\s+Now\s+what\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: "Randy Rees (Volt Computer)" <a-rrees@microsoft.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:46:23 -0700; Thanks to all those who gave me suggestions, I replaced the left front rotor as a matter of course even though it seemed true, I replaced the left front bearings and will do the right ones tonight (e; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01308.html (8,406 bytes)
2. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: britcars@juno.com (Lawrence J Alexander); Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:35:59 EDT; I suggest you plan to replace the left-side bearings again! 70 ft.lbs is the correct torque once you have set the end float; 70 ft.lbs if you haven't done that is enough to damage the bearings, evid; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01312.html (9,339 bytes)
3. RE: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 13:52:00 -0700 (PDT); You can get an assortment of shims form Vicky Brit or Moss. Buy about 10 with 7 in the very thin range (2-3 each of the 3 smallest sizes). Perhaps your right caliper has frozen up a bit or the pads h; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01316.html (11,583 bytes)
4. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 13:09:44 -0500; Hey! What's the flat rate for changing wheel bearings? I understand exactly what Mr. Alexander is saying and, in fact, tried to do it a time or two. That "selectively use the shimms" part can waste a; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01317.html (9,219 bytes)
5. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 13:40:49 -0500 (CDT); Having reviewed the procedure in detail once again, I present my original question, which hasn't yet been answered to my satisfaction: Why, exactly and technically, is this necessary? -- Todd Mullins; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01318.html (7,961 bytes)
6. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: britcars@juno.com (Lawrence J Alexander); Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 15:51:04 EDT; Todd...I don't know why my original answer to your question didn't reach you, but here follows a re-post of what I wrote........ On Tue, 19 Aug 1997 13:50:04 -0500 (CDT) todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01319.html (9,477 bytes)
7. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 15:56:00 -0700 (PDT); I did not write that [] part though the message implies I did but I will bite anyway. I can guess that since the use of the shims allows the bearing to be installed without preloading a force to the; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01320.html (8,830 bytes)
8. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 16:49:17 -0500 (CDT); Actually, it did reach me, and you raise an interesting point, but I'm still not quite satisfied. This is an interesting and unique observation. It makes a lot of sense and tickles all the right fuzz; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01327.html (10,249 bytes)
9. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>; Date: 21 Aug 1997 17:14:34 -0500; It is a pretty sleazy metal, but it is a steel alloy and not pot metal, at least. The reason it doesn't have to be strong is because it is subjected only to compressive forces (under normal circumsta; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01331.html (9,314 bytes)
10. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: Spook37211@aol.com; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 15:39:21 -0400 (EDT); << I object, slightly, to the tedious procedure. But I'd also really like to know exactly why this system was used in the first place. I know some of you are sick of talking about this, and others of; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01448.html (8,150 bytes)
11. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: Spook37211@aol.com; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 16:09:44 -0400 (EDT); << nnoyance, but there is a reason for leaving the spacer in place and using shims to set the bearing pre-load......When the castellated nut is tightened against, in order, the outer bearing's inner; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01450.html (8,574 bytes)
12. Re: Modulation Gone! Now what? (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 15:48:12 +0000; My manuals state that wheel-bearing end-float should be .002 to .004 in. To my mind this means that to add shims till you get wobble then remove one shim, as recently advised is incorrect. Surely it; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01488.html (7,874 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]