Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tail\s+Light\s+Assemble\s+interchangability\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tail\s+Light\s+Assemble\s+interchangability\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Tail Light Assemble interchangability (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:13:21 EDT; I own (or am owned by) a 1974 Midget, but I have always liked the appearance of the "sculpted" 1961-1969 tail light lenses (all red) rather than the "blocky" 1970-1980 red and amber lenses. Are the; /html/spridgets/2005-04/msg00560.html (7,231 bytes)
2. Re: Tail Light Assemble interchangability (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:25:53 -0400; The lenses are NOT interchangable, but the whole lamp is. There is a minor adjustment to one of the body holes going from one lamp to the other. But I forget if it's putting new lamps on old Spridget; /html/spridgets/2005-04/msg00561.html (7,694 bytes)
3. Re: Tail Light Assemble interchangability (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:31:47 -0400; Direct swap. Take the current ones out and offer up the stylish units. Did it on my '72. You can also opt for amber signals if you want. -- jay fishbein wallingford, ct <http://home.ix.netcom.com/%7E; /html/spridgets/2005-04/msg00563.html (7,822 bytes)
4. Re: Tail Light Assemble interchangability (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:53:59 -0400; Older style units in a 70's doesn't require any modification. -- jay fishbein wallingford, ct <http://home.ix.netcom.com/%7Etype79/> http://home.ix.netcom.com/~type79/; /html/spridgets/2005-04/msg00564.html (7,645 bytes)
5. Re: Tail Light Assemble interchangability (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:13:31 -0400; Then it must have been when I stuck newer 70s lamps in an older 60s Spridget. Probably a car I flipped just to get rid of those ugly later lamps. Cause they were better than none at the time ;) I rem; /html/spridgets/2005-04/msg00565.html (7,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]