Mail Archive Search: <+from:HW200@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:HW200@aol.com: 90 ]

Total 90 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Rivet ,Rivet/Froggy went a Bodying (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:05:38 -0500 (EST); Rebodies are passing....authentic Tigers are not.....what is the Tiger world coming to. ......notations for non-original rivets, that is a wild, wild thing. This basically answers the first question; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00137.html (9,843 bytes)
62. Re: Rivet ,Rivet/Froggy went a Bodying (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 16:46:07 -0500 (EST); I am for anyone building a car for the their personal enjoyment. I don't think a self proclaimed authority should solely focus on individual certification, rounding up data that if is not confirmed,; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00141.html (7,747 bytes)
63. Re: Re[6]: The trouble with TAC / Call for consensus and san (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 17:03:56 -0500 (EST); YES Ramon you are right... I am confused, explain if the TAC folks use the information supplied by the registry for backup. Do they work together in any way or not? Do they share any of the same data; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00142.html (8,526 bytes)
64. Re: I think the point was missed... (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 13:29:15 -0500 (EST); Dan, I think you are right! The question I asked was if an Alpine body was used to save a Tiger, would it still be a Tiger. The answer is yes, (If all the production line items and techniques are sti; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00181.html (8,710 bytes)
65. Re: A simple solution ! ! (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 15:30:52 -0500 (EST); Why is it that there is so many secertive insider vague references, and assumptions going on here? If everyone recalls this was started with a question???? I have a Jensen assembly line Tiger with a; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00233.html (8,030 bytes)
66. Fwd: Missunderstood...Bingo (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 15:39:35 -0500 (EST); -- Forwarded message: From: DDOORNBOS@rr5.rr.intel.com (Where do I get my Rhinestone Bunny Suit) Sender: owner-tigers@autox.team.net Reply-to: DDOORNBOS@rr5.rr.intel.com (Where do I get my Rhineston; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00235.html (9,214 bytes)
67. Re: Certifying Restoration Shops...... (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:15:52 -0500 (EST); How about it....maybe we should be concerned more with certifying the restoration shops than the cars. Think about it....if a basket case is brought back to life maintaining all the Jensen assembly l; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00267.html (6,617 bytes)
68. Re: Authentic or not? (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:17:39 -0500 (EST); It is easier to fake a Shelby than a Tiger. The stamped "code" is the original VIN number on the frame. I have seen chicanery with the K code stamps, and I guarantee you it exists with the Shelby rac; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00268.html (7,128 bytes)
69. Re: Worst fears confirmed (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:31:33 -0500 (EST); Ramon is right......the best way to move on in this situation is to host an STOA event. Trying to discuss this with "babble" is way to meaningless.....let's drink some beer and fart out our differenc; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00270.html (7,067 bytes)
70. Re: No Tiger Content (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 20:29:32 -0500 (EST); The Copperhead is a derivative of the Viper, not the Prowler, therefore the snake family name ....as opposed to the Prowler derivatives :"burglar" or "thief" and "criminal", of course those names are; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00448.html (6,608 bytes)
71. Re: Sunbeam Tiger and Maxwell Smart (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:15:31 -0500 (EST); Don Adams is an avid Horse racing fan. A little over a year ago I saw him out at Hollywood Park....we picked up a brief but fun conversation about the show. He had just missed a cocktail waitress car; /html/tigers/1997-02/msg00115.html (8,042 bytes)
72. Re: windows... (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:26:16 -0500 (EST); Dan! a '51 olds engine in a '52 Caddy!!!! There must have been a lawsuit about that. Are you sure it wasn't a 289? And didn't Maxwell Smart drive a early 50's vintage Cadillac in one of the episodes?; /html/tigers/1997-02/msg00116.html (6,461 bytes)
73. Re: ANDY'S TIGER (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 12:28:53 -0500 (EST); I was think the same thing- buying new with a 289 keeps coming up.; /html/tigers/1997-02/msg00155.html (6,418 bytes)
74. CBS has been notified... (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 15:10:22 -0500 (EST); Well folks, CBS has been notified regarding the upcoming Tigers United as well as the controversy surrounding one of their employees Tigers (Andy Rooney). The "Coast To Coast" producers seem very int; /html/tigers/1997-02/msg00161.html (7,012 bytes)
75. Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :) (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 16:40:39 -0500 (EST); I have a Tiger also produced late in 1966. It has a 260, (2589) intermittent manufacturing between 260's and 289's is more than a legend, it's a farce. Not only would a manufacturer be scrambling wit; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00037.html (8,101 bytes)
76. Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :) (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:43:27 -0500 (EST); I understand the Chevy Monza situation, my point is: How did Chevrolet and the dealerships represent the engine size to the consumer? Perhaps my 351ci substitition analogy in a modern Mustang is far; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00053.html (8,256 bytes)
77. Re: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :) (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 21:04:55 -0500 (EST); When has anyone in the American society settled accross the board on values? The fact is IF a 289 had ever been put in place of a 260 someone (ROOTES OR CHRYSLER) would have been sued ....pure and si; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00061.html (8,935 bytes)
78. Re: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :) (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 21:00:43 -0500 (EST); Fact is Jay, depending on when you brought it up, if the sticker says 260 and you've got a 289 in 1974 (Oil crisis) you are pissed! You have got a 289 NOW yet all the books AND DOCUMENTATION SAY 260,; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00062.html (8,981 bytes)
79. Re: Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :) (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 21:14:10 -0500 (EST); There is ONE law here buddy - representation! If the sticker says 260 it be a 260, otherwise you have a lawsuit. THAT IS MISREPRESENTATION OTHERWISE. Whether it is the oil crisis or a loss of power (; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00063.html (9,375 bytes)
80. Re: 260/289? (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 13:41:46 -0500 (EST); Only if you collect inverted biplane stamps....I would throw it away (especially after it been licked). The 289 Tiger is a different story.; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00074.html (6,794 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]