Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+260\s+versus\s+302\s+Starter\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] 260 versus 302 Starter (score: 1)
Author: Brian Glenn <ora_archy@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
I'm just wrapping up a change over to a 302. Can I use the 260 starter? I recall someone mentioning a smaller, stronger starter. Where would I find information, purchase and how much? Any drawbacks
/html/tigers/2011-04/msg00184.html (7,186 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] 260 versus 302 Starter (score: 1)
Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:28:29 -0400
all 157 tooth flywheel starters are the same. the gear reduction ones are smaller, lighter and easier on the battery. also easier on your solenoid because you are only switching the load of the built
/html/tigers/2011-04/msg00185.html (8,353 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] 260 versus 302 Starter (score: 1)
Author: "James Lindner" <jliny5@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:14:49 -0400
Here is the text from an email I sent to the list back last fall. I was having problems with my original starter on my Mk1, so I switched to the one mentioned below. After some problems this summer,
/html/tigers/2011-04/msg00187.html (9,052 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] 260 versus 302 Starter (score: 1)
Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:39:48 -0400
Jim's right, as is Owain. The starter will work wherever the old starter worked, with the 160 tooth flywheel and the 157 tooth flywheel. The wiring change is simple, the starter fits better under hea
/html/tigers/2011-04/msg00188.html (9,881 bytes)

5. Re: [Tigers] 260 versus 302 Starter (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry & Maureen \(Mo\)" <JCMC2006@suddenlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:19:20 -0500
The small geared Ford starter works just fine; there are at least three ways to wire it. If you have money to burn get a new one, otherwise like I did, I bought one from a wrecking yard for $30.00, d
/html/tigers/2011-04/msg00189.html (8,697 bytes)

6. Re: [Tigers] 260 versus 302 Starter (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Dixon" <bobdixon@frii.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:49:38 -0600
Hi Brian, I found this tech tip extremely helpful. My 289 uses an 'automatic' starter. My 347 used a 'manual'. Both in a Tiger. http://static.speedwaymotors.com/pdf/91067433.pdf Good luck, Bob ______
/html/tigers/2011-04/msg00190.html (8,296 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu