- 1. [Tigers] Trans (score: 1)
- Author: "Ronak, TP \(Timothy\)" <Timothy.Ronak@crna.akzonobel.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:45:32 -0500
- I have a stoker motor and run the wide ratio with 2:88 and while I am happy with the performance I wish I would have waited and gone with the 5 speed option. I really do not like 4000 RPM on the 5 t
- /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00283.html (7,227 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Trans (score: 1)
- Author: MWood24020@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:29:59 EST
- I wish I would have waited and gone with the 5 speed option. That's what I'm going with...much easier, now that there is a turn key solution provided by Tom Hall. ;-) Mike Wood **Start the year off r
- /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00284.html (7,168 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Trans (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim" <jim@island.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:30:15 -0800
- I've got a close ratio with 3.54's ...so freeway cruising is pretty much I DO have a recently acquired '82 AMC tailhousing that I'd like to use for a T5 swap... I've read Dan Walter's article about i
- /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00285.html (7,932 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Trans (score: 1)
- Author: Carmods@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:47:43 EST
- Hi Jim, For all around derivability I would recommend you stick with the 3.35 low ratio in your T-5. It really smoothes out the clutch engagement. However if your normal driving mode is drag racing f
- /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00286.html (6,731 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Tigers] Trans (score: 1)
- Author: "Cliff Alexander" <mk1a@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:45:15 -0800
- I put Tom's 5 speed conversion behind a Ford 345HP crate motor and so it's great. I kept the 2.88 gears and when I took it up to TU30 the engine was turning 1700 to 1800RPM while cruising around 75MP
- /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00289.html (8,534 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu