Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Intakes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Intakes\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Intakes (score: 1): Author: Chris <CVaught@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 16:46:43 -1000; Have any of you installed an eldebrock performer rpm intake on your tiger? I trial fitted mine and it seems to be a tight fit with the engine off. Will it rub? Chris; /html/tigers/1999-09/msg00106.html (6,606 bytes)
2. Re: Intakes (score: 1): Author: Steve Wickland <wickland@poseidontech.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 17:23:31 -0700; Chris, Another issue that you might consider is clearance to the firewall. The newer Performer RPMs place the carb further back than the F4B. Some people with center pivot floats have had clearance p; /html/tigers/1999-09/msg00118.html (6,957 bytes)
3. Re: Intakes (score: 1): Author: JHef101@aol.com; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 18:19:36 EDT; Put one on my 289 two years ago with engine in car, no problems at all. Good fit with no conflicts. Jeff Hefner B9470028; /html/tigers/1999-09/msg00145.html (6,566 bytes)
4. Re: Intakes (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 08:33:44 -0700; Chris, I do not believe this is correct. A line drawn from the right front of the pair of outside mount holes to the left rear outside mount holes, and vice versa, of those pair in the center of the; /html/tigers/1999-09/msg00165.html (8,696 bytes)
5. Re: Intakes (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:33:30 -0700; Chris, You are very welcome. I know that you are new to the Tiger game, and I provided some additional information on vacuum vs. mechanical secondaries, and how to get center hung float bowls on vacu; /html/tigers/1999-09/msg00210.html (11,167 bytes)
6. Re: Intakes (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:10:58 -0400; Steve, very interesting info on the manifolds. I also called Edlebrock, 9 months ago, and spoke to a tech rep. I asked him if I should keep the F4B or switch to another manifold. I told him I wanted; /html/tigers/1999-09/msg00217.html (6,955 bytes)
7. Intakes (score: 1): Author: Dave Binkley <dbinkley@argotech.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 10:12:02 -0800; You asked if a Victor Jr will fit under a stock hood? I don't know for sure but my guess is that it will not. Here's how I come to this conclusion. I recently installed an Edelbrock F4B on my otherwi; /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00321.html (7,790 bytes)
8. Fwd: Intakes (score: 1): Author: KJENSSEN@aol.com; Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15:32:48 EST; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_916950769_boundary Content-ID: <0_916950769@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1> << Hi Dave, I just went up to the edelbrock web page <A HREF="http://www.edel; /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00325.html (7,585 bytes)
9. Re: Intakes (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 16:21:10 -0800; Dave, You are correct. BTDT. In using the A and B stuff, you must also consider the slope of the engine, the motor mount condition, and the slope of the hood. Got caught on the F4B and Holley actual; /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00331.html (7,524 bytes)
10. Intakes (score: 1): Author: d_mountjoy@mail.nmusd.k12.ca.us (Darrell Mountjoy); Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 14:05:30 -0800; Jeff, I have the Edelbrock Performer PRM 302 (stock #7121) intake on my Tiger. This is the stock replacement manifold for the Shelby GT350s. The outside dimentional specs are basically the same as th; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00329.html (7,298 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]