Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Flywheel\:How\s+lite\s+is\s+too\s+lite\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Flywheel\:How\s+lite\s+is\s+too\s+lite\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 22:46:34 -0500; I have a 19lb flywheel now, but for my engine rebuild, I've obtained a wheel lightened to about 12lbs. Is this too lite for street use? What kind of problems , if any can I expect. Thanks in Advance,; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00283.html (7,261 bytes)
2. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:11:12 -0500 (EST); The only problem with a flywheel that's 12 pounds is that it might be weakened from loosing all the mass. Presuming that your crank is the late-style, that's easily 1/2 of the stock flywheel weight,; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00284.html (8,650 bytes)
3. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:42:50 -0600; I don't have a clue if 12 pounds is too light for a TR6, but I do know what happens if you have too light a flywheel in a car. It is very difficult to smoothly start the car up from rest. This can b; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00286.html (8,036 bytes)
4. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:24:01 -0500; Just to clarify, the flywheel is one made by PRI in Oregon. Looks well crafted. Anyone had experience? John http://www.prirace.com/engine.htm; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00287.html (9,216 bytes)
5. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:30:49 -0500; I think Bob's TR6 needs to go on a low carb diet or something, because his crank is morbidly overweight! 64lbs is pretty much spot on for stock 70-76 TR6 crankshafts. Kai -- Kai M. Radicke Wishbone C; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00288.html (7,801 bytes)
6. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:42:51 -0500 (EST); Umm... my cranks are def lighter than that. :-0 How about 80 pounds _with the flywheel_? I still haven't shipped a crank, but I do find that moving the spares around the garage to be a good way to ge; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00290.html (8,330 bytes)
7. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:08:17 -0700; Well, I just weighed an early crank before shipping it to Ontario, and with box, it is 66#, so 64# is just right! Bill Slightly Classics Tucson; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00318.html (8,269 bytes)
8. Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: John Mitchell <jmitch@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 22:46:34 -0500; I have a 19lb flywheel now, but for my engine rebuild, I've obtained a wheel lightened to about 12lbs. Is this too lite for street use? What kind of problems , if any can I expect. Thanks in Advance,; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01045.html (8,045 bytes)
9. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:11:12 -0500 (EST); The only problem with a flywheel that's 12 pounds is that it might be weakened from loosing all the mass. Presuming that your crank is the late-style, that's easily 1/2 of the stock flywheel weight,; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01046.html (9,707 bytes)
10. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:42:50 -0600; I don't have a clue if 12 pounds is too light for a TR6, but I do know what happens if you have too light a flywheel in a car. It is very difficult to smoothly start the car up from rest. This can b; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01048.html (9,075 bytes)
11. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: John Mitchell <jmitch@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:24:01 -0500; Just to clarify, the flywheel is one made by PRI in Oregon. Looks well crafted. Anyone had experience? John http://www.prirace.com/engine.htm; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01049.html (10,238 bytes)
12. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kradicke@wishboneclassics.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:30:49 -0500; I think Bob's TR6 needs to go on a low carb diet or something, because his crank is morbidly overweight! 64lbs is pretty much spot on for stock 70-76 TR6 crankshafts. Kai -- Kai M. Radicke Wishbone C; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01050.html (8,910 bytes)
13. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:42:51 -0500 (EST); Umm... my cranks are def lighter than that. :-0 How about 80 pounds _with the flywheel_? I still haven't shipped a crank, but I do find that moving the spares around the garage to be a good way to ge; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01052.html (9,355 bytes)
14. Re: Flywheel:How lite is too lite? (score: 1): Author: Bill McLeod <wbmcleod@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:08:17 -0700; Well, I just weighed an early crank before shipping it to Ontario, and with box, it is 66#, so 64# is just right! Bill Slightly Classics Tucson; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01080.html (9,036 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]