Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oil\s+Treatment\s+question\s+$rant\,\s+little\s+LBC$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oil\s+Treatment\s+question\s+$rant\,\s+little\s+LBC$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Oil Treatment question (rant, little LBC) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:21:17 -0800; On the contrary, the oil additive people have been going at it hot and heavy for the last 20 years or so. Seems to me it was Slick 50 that started the most recent craze, which has included Prolong,; /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg00116.html (8,682 bytes)
2. RE: Oil Treatment question (rant, little LBC) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 11:44:21 -0500; Yeah, but their advertising was much, much better than the long "scholarly" infomercials you get nowadays for Prolong and the like! Who among us (well, among us old f*rts, anyway) will ever forget "S; /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg00118.html (7,577 bytes)
3. RE: Oil Treatment question (rant, little LBC) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:49:24 -0800; Well, as long as we're doing true confessions ... I've actually used it as an engine oil additive. It's basically a viscosity 'improver'; it gave me a cheap way to put very heavy oil into a dying eng; /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg00172.html (7,638 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]