Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfires\s+with\s+camber\s+compensators\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfires\s+with\s+camber\s+compensators\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Spitfires with camber compensators (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:30:31 EST; Joe Curry, are you listening? :-) This question has become one on the level with the Ford v. Chevy (or MoPar) debate. The main advantage of the camber compensator is that it is a single, bolt-on piec; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00800.html (8,463 bytes)
2. Re: Spitfires with camber compensators (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:39:33 -0600; See my earlier message. Yes, the improvement is significant - NO arguement. The old system allows for near-instantaneous 180 degree changes in direction when the rear wheel tucks in during spirited; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00810.html (8,620 bytes)
3. Re: Spitfires with camber compensators (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:46:03 +0000; While I agree that using "used" parts is a good idea, finding a good used swing-spring is a chore in itself. Most are already used up and display either broken leaves or sagging ones. Either one of; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00813.html (9,899 bytes)
4. Re: Spitfires with camber compensators (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:17:55 -0500; Well, I think I'll be able to give an honest opinion on the handling between the later 1500 handling and the early Spit with the camber compensator, as I'll own one of each once I install the comp. o; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00929.html (9,214 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]