Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR3B\s+with\s+\'wrong\'\s+$TR4$\s+engine\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR3B\s+with\s+\'wrong\'\s+$TR4$\s+engine\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:39:42 -0400; This thread reminded me of my early TR4-TR3B experiences. When I bought my '65 TR4 in '68 (it was the TR dealer's salesman's demo in Okla. City), In late '69 I met another student (from Chicago, as; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00614.html (8,540 bytes)
2. Re: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:46:40 -0500; Actually, the TR3 had the garden hose valve but NO emissions stuff. The breather went right from the crankcase to the open air down the side of the engine. This one has the same emissions stuff as a; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00625.html (9,616 bytes)
3. Re: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:48:12 -0800; Actually I had quite an education on the TR3B at the Palo Alto meet (over 100 Triumphs + a few other LBCs <g>) the owner of one particularly nice one explained to me that the TR3B was essentially an; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00637.html (8,883 bytes)
4. Re: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:46:02 EST; TR3s and most all TR3As, yes. But it seems possible that some late TR3Bs might have had some "closed" breather system via the vent or port in the valve cover, particularly those sold in California. I; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00643.html (8,128 bytes)
5. Re: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:14:19 -0400; Interesting note Andy- maybe Calif was the 'testing ground for that now infamous PVC contraption. In my Oklahoma days, I eliminated the recirculation breather on my TR4 (as it kept 'gooking up' the c; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00653.html (9,475 bytes)
6. Re: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:51:10 +0100; Date sent: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:48:12 -0800 To: "Don Sforza" <dsforza@megahits.com>, "Triumph List" <triumphs@autox.team.net>, "Sherman D. Taffel" <staffel@home.com> From Bill & Skip Pugh <anabil at c; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00664.html (8,535 bytes)
7. Re: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 21:24:32 -0500; Actually, gentlemen, the TR4 was just a TR3 with a TR4 body. And the TR 250 was just a 6 cylinder TR4 or was it, after all, a 6 cylinder TR3... And if those Zeniths on the TR3B are original, I'll eat; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00666.html (9,461 bytes)
8. Re: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:29:04 -0500; Message text written by INTERNET:Herald948@aol.com own (soon to be Brad's, but aren't most Triumphs? :-) )< The ones that aren't soon to be Brad's are only destined to be Brad's. ;-) Dave; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00675.html (7,765 bytes)
9. Re: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 01:28:18 -0700; I can only go by a concurrently-produced car, the early TR4. My first one, a mid-year `62 (CT2334L), with an original engine, had a road draft tube and SUs. What the folks on the west coast got, I ca; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00682.html (9,654 bytes)
10. RE: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:47:59 -0500; Or Brad would wish them to be his. Message text written by INTERNET:Herald948@aol.com own (soon to be Brad's, but aren't most Triumphs? :-) )< The ones that aren't soon to be Brad's are only destined; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00685.html (8,164 bytes)
11. RE: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:18:19 -0500; Message text written by "Musson, Carl" coating strong enough. It will survive the heat, that's what it's designed for. < And wishes do come true. At least there in Never-Never-Kahlerland. Dave; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00692.html (8,065 bytes)
12. RE: TR3B with 'wrong' (TR4) engine (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:21:01 -0800; According to California's DMV web site, closed crankcase ventilation was not required until 1963. And, as I recall, OEMs were not required to make modifications just for CA until 1971. My 1967 Plymou; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00711.html (8,661 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]