Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*To\s+Powder\s+Coat\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+Powder\s+Coat\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*To\s+Powder\s+Coat\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+Powder\s+Coat\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. To Powder Coat or not to Powder Coat? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:21:38 -0400; I've shipped my rims off to Newton, MA after deciding the www.rimandwheelworks.com seemed best able to deal with my wonky wheels. I asked them to sandblast, true and powder coat the rims. All are go; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00414.html (7,116 bytes)
2. Re: To Powder Coat or not to Powder Coat? (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:44:09 EDT; Personal preference? No tight relationships with any powdercoaters? Might be quite a few reasons. Dave (with P/C'd wire wheels on the TR3); /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00419.html (7,472 bytes)
3. Re: To Powder Coat or not to Powder Coat? (score: 1): Author: "FRED E THOMAS" <frede.thomas2@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:05:12 -0400; B-S on the paint, P/C is the best way to go for looks and durability, might cost more but what a difference, and it will flex more than paint, now this is a sound reason :) :) :) "FT" == Apparently t; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00421.html (7,337 bytes)
4. Re:To Powder Coat or not to Powder Coat? (score: 1): Author: Allen Hess <allenhess@mgcarclub.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:09:43 -0400; A friend with an MG Midget and Rostyle wheels had them powder coated and a year or two later the finish had cracked and checked. The powder coater did them over. I have no idea if this might be typic; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00432.html (6,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]