Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*admittedly\,\s+I\s+try\s+not\s+to\s+inject\s+politics\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*admittedly\,\s+I\s+try\s+not\s+to\s+inject\s+politics\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: admittedly, I try not to inject politics... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 14:41:09 EDT; << I see this as part of the "State's rights" movement, which I'm heartily in favor of. In other words, the state and local governments should be tasked with regulating the police, _not_ the federal; /html/triumphs/2001-05/msg00484.html (7,851 bytes)
2. Re: admittedly, I try not to inject politics... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 15:22:38 -0400; A lawyer friend explained to me that the police can not detain you unless you are under arrest. And considering its a little difficult to search a moving person or object you must be arrested first.; /html/triumphs/2001-05/msg00485.html (8,036 bytes)
3. RE: admittedly, I try not to inject politics... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 15:31:50 -0500; There is a valid message in this (mostly) off-topic exchange. The decision holds that the US Constitution does not prevent a police officer from arresting you and holding you in jail for an offense s; /html/triumphs/2001-05/msg00488.html (8,723 bytes)
4. Re: admittedly, I try not to inject politics... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 22:57:57 EDT; Matt Ritter wrote: A lawyer friend explained to me that the police can not detain you unless you are under arrest. Matt, your friend may need a "refresher course". In NY (city) you may be "detained"; /html/triumphs/2001-05/msg00503.html (8,281 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]