Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*re\.\s+Going\s+retro\s+with\s+cassette\s+tapes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*re\.\s+Going\s+retro\s+with\s+cassette\s+tapes\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: Greg <one_second_zero@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:55:28 -0800 (PST); I can give a personal testimonial for this unit since I purchased it about 5 months ago. It does work both directions (from digital to tape and from tape to digital). I love it. I used to use the cas; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00007.html (9,073 bytes)
2. Re: re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: ZinkZ10C@aol.com; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:28:48 EST; << The PlusDeck software is very basic and doesn't do anything other than covert the files. It doesn't offer any editing or sound engineering features. I suspect the software maker offers a upgrade f; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00014.html (7,705 bytes)
3. RE: re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:58:51 -0500; Shhhhh Harold, you're giving away trade secrets from us software makers. I wonder if someone will push this backwards compatibility thing a step farther and start making a wax/tin foil cylinder engra; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00016.html (9,156 bytes)
4. RE: re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:05:52 -0800; No doubt ... but using a proper phonograph needle would probably have damaged them just as much or even more. BTDT ... Randall == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http:; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00019.html (7,611 bytes)
5. Re: re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: Steven Newell <steven@newellboys.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:45:20 -0700; Interesting link. Actually DVD makers could learn something from the Big 3 phonography companies -- who were able to agree on a standard to their mutual benefit. I understand that next-generation DVD; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00021.html (8,623 bytes)
6. RE: re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:45:39 -0800; So what exactly is the advantage of the PlusDeck over a conventional tape deck ? Just that it pushes a button for you every hour or so ? Don't recall the name offhand, but I use ripping software tha; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00022.html (8,570 bytes)
7. Re: re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:59:59 EST; Which might be just the thing when you're snowed in by that freak blizzard next Feb. Dave == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.vtr.org; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00036.html (7,766 bytes)
8. RE: re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:55:53 -0500; It would surely get you motivated to dig your way out. Hell, I'd dig my way through the Taku glacier with my hands to get away from a week of listening to somebody singing "Buffalo Gal" accompanied b; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00045.html (8,636 bytes)
9. Re: re. Going retro with cassette tapes (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:17:38 EST; Hey, now! Don't start comparing Don Ho to Slim Whitman! Dave == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.vtr.org; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00046.html (8,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]