Mail Archive Search: <+from:Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com: 249 ]

Total 249 documents matching your query.

1. Re: "The Fast & The Furious" - bad news for autocross (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:37:52 -0400; Roger's annual April fools gig? AB Andy Bettencourt National Business Development Manager Kingston Technology (508) 697-8111 Work (508) 697-8121 FAX "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friend To: "Team.Net (Gr; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00030.html (12,607 bytes)
2. Re: FS: new palm Vx (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:14:17 -0800; Now THAT is spam. However, a nice little note on the front end like this.... "Download your GEEZ! info into the cool Palm Vx" ...may keep the Snipster off your but but I doubt it. - Andy B Andrew Sch; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00361.html (8,163 bytes)
3. Re: harness bar legality in stock? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:31:25 -0500; Matt has the right idea. We need clarification. perhaps an SEB member can shed some light on the *intent* of the wording change. In my mind, anything that is bolted from B pillar to B pillar without; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00559.html (11,657 bytes)
4. Re: PAX for SM/2 (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:45:59 -0500; Isn't OSP based on "street" tires? AB "Pat Griffith" <griffser@hotmai To: mattm@optonline.net, nxracer@mediaone.net l.com> cc: autox@autox.team.net Sent by: Subject: Re: PAX for SM/2 owner-autox@auto; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00729.html (8,825 bytes)
5. Re: 1997 Neon ACR (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:38:08 -0800; AB SCCARcr@aol.com@autox.team.net on 02/02/2001 12:25:23 PM Please respond to SCCARcr@aol.com Sent by: owner-autox@autox.team.net To: autox@autox.team.net cc: Subject: Re: 1997 Neon ACR Ditto that P; /html/autox/2001-02/msg00061.html (7,368 bytes)
6. Re:Pro Solo Poll Results (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:39:53 -0800; I think what most people want in this case is simple: Keep RT as part of the run time BUT publish the RT so you can determine where (and how much) you need to improve. This, I think, needs a hardware; /html/autox/2001-02/msg00163.html (9,484 bytes)
7. Re: Do Monkeys fly in AS or GS? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:22:01 -0800; Where so you think GRM gets their info? Do you think they just make it up? Andy "Wondering if a car that does 0-60 in 5.7sec should be in GS" Bettencourt "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>@aut; /html/autox/2001-02/msg00759.html (8,445 bytes)
8. RE: Do Monkeys fly in AS or GS? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:09:30 -0800; Just remember, GS for now - as soon as some real data can be examined, it could be GONE. Then there is that new restructure in 2002.... These cars are hard to class...where would ya'll put the S4 and; /html/autox/2001-02/msg00765.html (10,580 bytes)
9. Re: Car Classifications (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:29:05 -0800; A great regional car but a touch heavy at 2700-2800 lbs and a soft torque curve from the 13B. Wheels a little narrow for the weight.. AB "davidschwabe" <davidschwabe@hotmail.com>@autox.team.net on 01; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00043.html (8,867 bytes)
10. Re: PRO's/Time/Attendance (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 06:44:32 -0800; It does affect the ones you choose...you are assuming that you are driving 100% of the time during work hours. Do what we don in New England... Grab a codriver and drive through the night. It'll cost; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00094.html (8,362 bytes)
11. Re: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work! (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:41:25 -0800; Work your magic baby! AB "Dave Beck" <DBSB80@msn.com>@autox.team.net on 01/15/2001 08:50:55 PM Please respond to "Dave Beck" <DBSB80@msn.com> Sent by: owner-autox@autox.team.net To: "Team.Net" <autox; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00290.html (7,600 bytes)
12. Re: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work! (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:45:23 -0800; I disagree. You sort of make the counter-point in your text. If the CSP Civic isn't even the car for the class anymore, then it should be easier for one to dominate that PAX number. Go to full race c; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00312.html (8,810 bytes)
13. Re: SM PAX (was: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work!) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:25:56 -0800; Aside from a cat, what makes the CSP cars illegal? My main point is that during the development of a class, you must err on the side of caution. That is clearly not the case in SM. You take a 'mid-pa; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00359.html (11,471 bytes)
14. Re: PRO SOLO, Show of hands..... (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 23:28:32 -0800; I don't like the options. I want to know my reaction time AND have it AB "HEYWARD WAGNER" <h_kenyon@email.msn.com>@autox.team.net on 01/22/2001 11:52:37 PM Please respond to "HEYWARD WAGNER" <h_kenyo; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00647.html (8,306 bytes)
15. Re: Why is the Supra in SM? Simple... (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 07:32:49 -0800; I would disagree that the RX-7 was eligible for SM at anytime in 2000. To that effect, take a look at the top Stock RX-7 time at those events and compare to SM. Interesting results. AB Dale Seeley <D; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00015.html (9,814 bytes)
16. Re: Stock class restrictions (was WRX) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 05:31:28 -0800; Those cars should not be in stock (Cobra R's - 1993, 1995, 2000). The production numbers just don't make sense. You can make all the argument you want about other cars that are in stock that have bee; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00259.html (8,123 bytes)
17. The REAL Issue - here in the frozen tundra (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:11:44 -0800; Been following this thread...with events that run from 150 to 200 drivers here in NER - do we WANT more solists? Nationals flirted with a cap, ProSolos frequently have waiting lists, and sites are ge; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00493.html (10,409 bytes)
18. Re: How many cylinders do you have? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 20:57:16 -0800; Current: 32 (8+8+4+4+6+1+1) AB Smokerbros@aol.com@autox.team.net on 12/17/2000 11:12:51 PM Please respond to Smokerbros@aol.com Sent by: owner-autox@autox.team.net To: autox@autox.team.net cc: Subjec; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00674.html (9,079 bytes)
19. Re: SACRILEGE (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:14:50 -0800; This is how a classic should be treated...when you are not driving it! A car can be pampered and driven at the same time. AB "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>@autox.team.net on 12/19/2000 02:16:50; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00774.html (7,541 bytes)
20. FS - MR2 Turbo (Sheehan or Burns?) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:59:14 -0800; Forwarded for Kim and Larry Fine. AB ** For Sale 91 Toyota MR2 - Turbo - no options - many many extras, wheels, tires, sway bars, trailer hitch, ect. email Kim & Larry Fine webefine@qcol.net or call; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00424.html (6,505 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]