Mail Archive Search: <+from:TeamZ06@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:TeamZ06@aol.com: 281 ]

Total 281 documents matching your query.

181. Re: New GT40 (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:05:46 EST; I hope they do a better job with the 5.4 than they did with 4.6. As an ex-Ford person, (and have never looked back) I found the 4.6 to be a real disappointment. Somehow, 500 hp out of a 5.4L with tw; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00119.html (7,299 bytes)
182. Re:Stock shock rules rewrite? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 22:02:26 EST; isn't it amazing how one little ember can smoulder and simmer away for days, then POOF, major forest fire ... :-) What happens when somebody claims your shocks and you don't have a spare set to drive; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00131.html (10,267 bytes)
183. Re: Stock shock rules rewrite? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:18:04 EST; I just don't understand why everyone is so worried about shock costs and technology. Recurring costs of using soft, fragile DOT race tires easily outstrip the cost of a good set of shocks that you ma; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00137.html (8,581 bytes)
184. Re: Stock shock rules rewrite? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 09:29:54 EST; Hey, I only asked the SEB to clarify the wording and eliminate some conflicts. The moral of the story is: Be careful what you ask the SEB for, you just might get more than you wanted. Mark /// unsubs; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00144.html (8,409 bytes)
185. Re: More Shocks and rules (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:59:37 EST; The inherent problem with this and even as currently stated in the rules, is that it's impossible to achieve once you factor in legal ride height change parameters. The conflict is the rules allow ch; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00147.html (9,852 bytes)
186. Re: More Shocks and rules (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:37:20 EST; you just eliminated almost every aftermarket shock, now the choice would be OE or custom only, some vary by 1/2" or more just in stroke. That's why the 1" variance came about. As I was informed, the; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00149.html (7,326 bytes)
187. Re: More Shocks and rules (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 20:26:45 EST; We already have a variance that's been in place for a very long time, when did it become broken? Unfortunately this is incorrect, the cost would be considerable to open up a sealed shock. Not all sho; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00163.html (7,350 bytes)
188. shock costs (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 20:54:27 EST; People, please get a grip on yourselves. You're worse than a bunch overzealous newshounds trying to drive up the 9/11 body count. NOBODY I know of is paying $8,000 for shocks. I have no idea where th; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00165.html (7,758 bytes)
189. Re: Byron's shock comments (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:08:11 EST; FWIW, I don't really disagree with Byron's assessment to go back to OE with a sunshine period for existing shocks (it could have been shorter and to the point :-). Ultimately that is the only real an; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00166.html (7,009 bytes)
190. Re: additional shocking details (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:51:23 EST; not necessarily, let the regions do as they please with regard to shocks, but require divisional and national competitors have to comply with National rules. Well if you allow those things, then why; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00225.html (11,918 bytes)
191. Re: [evolution-disc.]Stock costs hype (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 00:55:49 EST; Actually, most people in Stock are doing the opposite; they are running lower pressure. Pressure is just one factor, you also have to consider shaft diameter. Simply put: gas pressure extension force; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00228.html (9,651 bytes)
192. Site Contact Information Needed (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 05:26:13 EST; AlfaKarl/Karl Rickert asked me to post this on Team.net for him, please direct all replies and responses to alfakarl@hotmail.com: -- Site Contact Information Needed As the new Solo2 Chairman here in; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00268.html (7,612 bytes)
193. Area 3/SEDiv Solo2 Meeting Notes (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:05:06 EST; Dear SEDiv Solo2 Competitors: Just a *few* notes from this past weekend's annual Area 3 Meeting & Awards Banquet: -- Evolution Performance Driving School will be returning as the primary sponsor of t; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00312.html (11,971 bytes)
194. Re: Desparately Seeking An Autocross (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:11:43 EST; you might want to consider security and privacy concerns. You'd be surprised what a web search can reveal from all the unsecure solo2 event info that clubs post all across the country; you're dirty; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00342.html (8,246 bytes)
195. Re: 2003 Cobra - 390 HP (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:06:48 EST; Not sure what you're smoking there, good buddy, but IMO you probably should count on getting it's flanks lathered/whipped in SS. MS /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.ne; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00427.html (6,723 bytes)
196. Re: Changing Mazda computer in ASP RX-7 (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:20:43 EST; IMO the answer is most likely no. The OE computer on the Rx7TT is part of the turbo control loop. The SP rules prohibit modifying the turbo control loop, even if aftermarket parts are made to mimic O; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00437.html (7,406 bytes)
197. Re: New worm spoils the party, was: "Party" is no fun (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:25:22 EST; Whatever you do: DO NOT CLICK ONTO THE LINK IN THE TEXT! otherwise, gotcha. MS /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo ///; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00469.html (7,400 bytes)
198. Re: Toe inches & degrees (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 02:07:50 EST; First, I attributed that equation to Kevin, which was incorrect. Second, the equations are not equivalent. I was confused and miscalculated, that equation yields an answer 4 times larger than mine. H; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00000.html (7,328 bytes)
199. Re: Toe inches & degrees...Past response (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 03:40:06 EST; I don't know who originally figured this equation, but it is off by a factor of 2. The reason is that toe per side is not the difference between the the centerpoint of the wheel and the treadface; i.; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00004.html (8,842 bytes)
200. Re: simple Toe inches & degrees (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 10:45:05 EST; Actually Dick Rassmussens assessment that: toe inch = toe degree / 2 is accurate enough for autox purposes if you want a simple equation. Even a knuckleheaded Knuckledragger could handle that one :-p; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00007.html (7,426 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]