Mail Archive Search: <+from:buttheat@hotmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:buttheat@hotmail.com: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. 94 R Miata parts FS! (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 10:41:10 -0800; I have some 94 R Miata parts for anyone interested. These are all stock parts with less than 2K miles one them. Set of original Bilstien OEM shocks. Stock front sway bar. Stock stainless muffler 94 S; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00146.html (6,357 bytes)
2. Re: Porsche 944 Turbo in BP? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:37:52 -0800; This car is know as "The Weapon" and appropriately so ;-). want; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00207.html (8,069 bytes)
3. Re: Scoring System (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 15:39:10 -0800; The only thing I would like to see change a bit is with extreme weather inequalities. I've seen more than one NT and Nationals determined before you even take your first run. This is the case where y; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00346.html (8,815 bytes)
4. Re: 914 in BS (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 17:10:10 -0800; Ride height is not an issue anymore, and the speeds are about the same as when Jeff and Steve ran the cars. The issues is, the 94+ Miata is to fast for the 914. The 99 Miata makes it even harder. --J; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00415.html (8,263 bytes)
5. Re: Type R in GS (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 17:33:56 -0800; While I agree with fellow Team Butt Heat Bauer on the "classes change", I do not agree that they change unless the SCAC/SEB decide for them to do so. The classing case of the Type R in GS was not tho; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00418.html (11,548 bytes)
6. Re: Broken Miata Sway Bar mount question (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 13:13:17 -0800; I would replace it. I and may others have had them break. I had them welded two times and they broke within 1 month of the fix. I'm told the spot welds just hold the part on the assembly line until t; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00465.html (8,445 bytes)
7. Re: What happened to Stock Class? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 14:36:28 -0800; Smart move. That's what I should have done this last year ;-) --JCG; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00469.html (8,008 bytes)
8. Re: Pro Solo graphics feedback (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:53:34 -0700; Must.... Resist... I can't... So, the "Depends" car could conger up some real interesting graphics ;-). I can't wait to see the first dipper car ;-). --JCG -- Original Message -- From: Steven Volpp <; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01545.html (9,483 bytes)
9. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 12:35:16 -0700; The Audi TT would be at best competitive with the "regular" GS cars. I doesn't have the A4 multilink suspension, it's only FWD with no limited slip, and it weighs 2900 (ask Curtis Ames who weighed hi; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00199.html (10,272 bytes)
10. Re: I'm part of the 900! (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 12:44:28 -0700; 1 Joe Goeke 2 buttheat@hotmail.com 3 Bothell, WA. 4 AS, BMW Z3 Coupe, TUE/WED 5 Friday for the Pro. Leave Sat morning with hangover from bad beer of Friday night awards banquet ;-) 6 Clubhouse 7 Hopi; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00203.html (8,968 bytes)
11. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:12:51 -0700; The A4 wasn't that of a mystery to me :-). I picked the A4 based on the numbers and the suspension goodies. Both cars have good low end torque. Lets see. TT, 2900/170 = 17.059 for torque to weight. A; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00212.html (12,529 bytes)
12. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:19:41 -0700; The 225hp Quattro TT will be interesting. If in GS, it would be the only thing I would consider running against a Type R or Talon. If AS, it would have a chance also, depending on what you can get th; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00215.html (10,214 bytes)
13. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:22:21 -0700; According to a racing scale, it's 2900 ;-). Curtis's car was bone stock. You should have seen his eyes when he found out how much it really weighed. For a reference, I weighed my Z3 coupe again, and; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00217.html (8,541 bytes)
14. Re: Audi TT in GS (Was: Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming....") (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 09:58:51 -0700; I would agree with AS for the two new Audi's, but we have seen stranger classing in the last year or so ;-). --JCG -- Original Message -- From: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com> To: 'Kent Rafferty' <gs; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00274.html (9,410 bytes)
15. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:20:19 -0700; Oh please!!!!! Just look at the data before making generalization statements like "perceived" top car. Look at the GS times compared to the other classes this year, and then the last couple of years.; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00275.html (9,635 bytes)
16. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:31:36 -0700; I'll take a light under torqued car with a great LSD and double wishbone suspension, over a heavier/torque car ANY day. So you are saying that no good drivers are running in GS except for the Type R; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00276.html (11,561 bytes)
17. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:16:37 -0700; This is all quite humorous (no insults implied). class, go. OK two things: 1) Only if they run in or near the same run group. This year it shouldn't be to bad, for they run one group off each other o; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00300.html (11,715 bytes)
18. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:22:46 -0700; You'll also recall, I lost by 1.5 seconds at that event. Just showing even more that the cars are mismatched, for on some days they run similar times, and other days/courses HUGE differences. The sam; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00301.html (14,621 bytes)
19. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:24:51 -0700; If this happens, I'll buy all the GS Type R and Talon drivers a beer! ;-). You know me and my beer, so you KNOW I'm serious ;-). --JCG; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00302.html (8,967 bytes)
20. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:27:13 -0700; Once again, you have to compare times of established drivers. As in, if you took those same drivers and had them change cars. Would they end up similar positions or not. --JCG -- Original Message --; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00303.html (9,218 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]